Launch prices of $400 and $500/600 were already anomalous by that thinking. And would seem to contradict in spirit the mantle of the 'struggles' you feel MS would not have ignored in coming out of the XBox gen.
$200 from $400 (essentially) after 2 1/2 years isn't all that shoddy a move IMO in terms of the price reduction. As for Nintendo, well, they had probably planned on lowering the price, true, but they needn't maintain it due to the high prices of the others, they just simply lucked out by having a piece of kit in super-high demand.
$400.00 makes sense when you are the first and only player on the market. The PS2 retail in Japan for USD 380.00.
The PS3 was never intended to be $500-$600 dollars. Sony had alot of misstep going into this generation. Do you not remember Sony and Toshiba announced that their partnership would be mass producing 45 nm about a year before Intel's target for 45nm. Sony had Bluray prototypes in 2000 and recorders on shelves in 2003. Sony depended on perfect execution on their PS3 plans and failed on several fronts, hence the large retail price of the PS3.
I not saying the price reductions are shoddy other than the PS3 which is limited by its costly components but MS and Ninty have benefited from Sony woes by allowing them to maintain a conservative price reduction strategy that in MS case has allowed some cushion from the RROD fiasco. RROD would of hurt alot worse if the market would have played out in more traditional fashion.
Last edited by a moderator: