That's one of the most bewildering design choices of PS4. Initially I was convinced this was because Sony had a TrustZone implementation, which required I/O over USB for SouthBridge oversight, but there's no suggestion of TrustZone. They obviously did it for a reason but that reason isn't obvious. It makes as much sense as season 7 of Lost.I'm still "praying" that they found a few extra pins on this SoCs to have a real SATA3 interface instead of this lousy USB => SATA bridge so you can have the benefits of a real SSD or hybrid HDD.
If you look closely between the USB ports there is a flaw.Actually on further viewing the close up section of the Eurogamer video the glossy plastic with the disc drive and usb ports in contrast with the top and bottom matte plastic looks kinda nice..
http://gifyu.com/images/PS4ss.gif
If you look closely between the USB ports there is a flaw.
Cheaper?damnit this thing better bet 16nm and thus cooler.quieter. Otherwise what is the point?
Except it costs more.Might as well as just go with neo if you are a non-ps4 owner
You know, it's pretty easy to identify the rich people on the internet.
Cheaper?
Except it costs more.
You know, it's pretty easy to identify the rich people on the internet.
A third (4th?) gen Vita with 1080p screen and better controls, to facilitate a better PS4 streaming experience, is the only thing that makes sense. And that still makes very little sense.The PS4-slim leaker also mentioned a PSP-like handheld.
A third (4th?) gen Vita with 1080p screen and better controls, to facilitate a better PS4 streaming experience, is the only thing that makes sense. And that still makes very little sense.
I'm thinking more like $150 difference between neo/slim as $100 wouldn't make much sense spec wise. Ideal scenario: neo costs $399 and the slim $249 (the absolute base models).
I think it pretty safe to assume that there'll be a greater than $100 difference. If PS4S is $300 still, Neo will maybe be upwards of $450 to cash in on the more hard-core enthusiast. There'll be enough of a price difference to justify PS4S existence, that's for sure.Well no one knows the prices of these models yet but I think as someone who hasn't spent any money on consoles yet this "gen" a price difference of $100 between ps4 slim and ps4 neo would be any easy decision towards neo considering the difference in hardware..
But is it significant enough to not trigger a complete migration? Because that should be the goal, you don't wants Neo to become the majority... Or do you? I would sense purchasers fatigue with PS5.I think it pretty safe to assume that there'll be a greater than $100 difference. If PS4S is $300 still, Neo will maybe be upwards of $450 to cash in on the more hard-core enthusiast. There'll be enough of a price difference to justify PS4S existence, that's for sure.
Furthermore, $100 is still a 33% difference. That's significant to a lot of the cost-sensitive.