RenegadeRocks
Legend
oh yea, that was amazing and in VR
! I am sure that will be the biggest VR showcase ! But the new NFS definitely looks the part !
oh yea, that was amazing and in VR
! I am sure that will be the biggest VR showcase ! But the new NFS definitely looks the part !
I could certainly tell this was rendered, didn't look particularly convincing as live action to me. On the other hand it still looked awesome and I do agree with the assertion that Frosbite is pretty much top of the graphics food chain atm. I'm not sure why you think the Robinson trailer was on a different level though. It also looked great but it was (at a stretch) as good as this IMO in a much more constrained environment. And it's also unlikely to be reflective of the final product, unlike the DICE video above which everyone who's played BF knows is exactly what the game looks like.
upnorthsox
Veteran
Funny, I played the game and it didn't look anything like that trailer.
On what? On PC that's exactly what it looks like aside from the difference in setting.
upnorthsox
Veteran
Oh, then please use this link from now on...
https://forum.beyond3d.com/threads/star-wars-battlefront.57318/
Thanks.
Robinson's trailer has far better lighting and volumetric lighting, much denser geometry, not a single low res texture in sight and a general CGI esque sheen perhaps due to better post processing effects. I don't know man, to me BF's trailer did not hold a candle to it. That said it still looked pretty impressive tho not at the top of the pyramid.
Maybe we could just tag everyone by their primary gaming platform and enforce segregation by blocking access to different forums unless the tag matches? That would certainly be conducive to conversation.
I'd disagree on the lighting points. On the foliage point.... well the Battlefront video was set in a desert so.....
L. Scofield
Veteran
If it had decent explosion effects it could look so much better...
Also I don't understand why they remove the motion blur, especially in a cinematic trailer.
As for Robinson, lets remember what it actually looks like:
http://www.roadtovr.com/crytek-executive-producer-elijah-freeman-one-ip-career-likely-show-promise/
Also I don't understand why they remove the motion blur, especially in a cinematic trailer.
As for Robinson, lets remember what it actually looks like:
http://www.roadtovr.com/crytek-executive-producer-elijah-freeman-one-ip-career-likely-show-promise/
We have no idea! But it's likely not in any way a GPU accelerator type thing. About the most it can contribute as mentioned above is post AA to save the PS4 having to do that. The reprojection seems to just be a bit of move and scale and not fancy frame interpolation.
Niebotskick
Newcomer
"Explore the planets: http://starwars.ea.com/starwars/battlefront/planets
Prepare to be transported to a galaxy far, far away and fight in epic multiplayer or intense missions on Hoth, Endor, Tatooine and the previously unexplored planet, Sullust. Let’s Play Star Wars™."
L. Scofield
Veteran
So the engine is capable of displaying a fire particle effect without retarded super bloom around it.
Billy Idol
Legend
I wish the graphics would be like the trailer....
The explore is really cool, looks fantastic.
They've spent some serious dollar on that website. Brilliant.
upnorthsox
Veteran
Now if they had only spent serious dollar on a SP..........................tragic.
EA is already working on a single player Star Wars game. Great marketing for Battlefront by the way, Dice is using that IP brilliantly. Almost makes me wanna buy the game :smile:
Similar threads
