Inuhanyou
Veteran
Hopefully this means no PS5 pro as well and they are putting all their efforts into securing supply while researching all the possible ps6 technologies
Hopefully this means no PS5 pro as well and they are putting all their efforts into securing supply while researching all the possible ps6 technologies
Power consumption. It's a hard wall. Limited to under 225 Watts for the entire system cpu, ram, gpu, nvme, USB, wifi, nics versus 450 watts for just the GPU.A 2027 PS6 only has 50 percent more gpu power than a GPU that will be out within a month? What kind of stagnation do you think GPUs will have for 5 years
It's 5 years. Are efficiency gains really so dead gen over gen that multiple gens from now to then will be so limiting?Power consumption. It's a hard wall. Limited to under 225 Watts for the entire system cpu, ram, gpu, nvme, USB, wifi, nics versus 450 watts for just the GPU.
We may only get at most 2 more nodes by the time we are at 2027. Seems about right.It's 5 years. Are efficiency gains really so dead gen over gen that multiple gens from now to then will be so limiting?
And graphene seems to be just a dream so far
Only 2 more node shrinks to 3nm and 1nm. After that we have no more performance increases without big power jumps. 3nm will bring 50-70% over RDNA 3 and 1nm a further 50-70% over RDNA 4. We end up with almost 3x the performance of RDNA 3 in the best case scenario of performance scaling. 50% faster than RDNA 3 puts the PS6 at exactly half the power of the fastest thing money can buy on PC. Makes perfect sense considering consoles cant supply 300+ watts to the GPU alone.A 2027 PS6 only has 50 percent more gpu power than a GPU that will be out within a month? What kind of stagnation do you think GPUs will have for 5 years
Also I kind of expect much higher bandwidth for ram. PS5 to ps4 was over double and you can get 1tb in certain cards already
I wonder what comes after 1nm then. Does technology across the board just stagnate? Surely there have been people thinking about this inevitably for many years.Only 2 more node shrinks to 3nm and 1nm. After that we have no more performance increases without big power jumps. 3nm will bring 50-70% over RDNA 3 and 1nm a further 50-70% over RDNA 4. We end up with almost 3x the performance of RDNA 3 in the best case scenario of performance scaling. 50% faster than RDNA 3 puts the PS6 at exactly half the power of the fastest thing money can buy on PC. Makes perfect sense considering consoles cant supply 300+ watts to the GPU alone.
ÅngströmsI wonder what comes after 1nm then.
Sorry I don't speak LatinÅngströms
@Shifty Geezer favourite discussion topic. New exotic architectures, perhaps more accelerators. ML/AI technologies. If you can’t shrink further, you’re going to have to work smarter.I wonder what comes after 1nm then. Does technology across the board just stagnate? Surely there have been people thinking about this inevitably for many years.
Graphene chips, quantum computing all seem like concepts we will never see in our lifetimes
Question. Is AMDs chiplet design something that will help with staving off that inevitable problem? Or is it all hot air?@Shifty Geezer favourite discussion topic. New exotic architectures, perhaps more accelerators. ML/AI technologies. If you can’t shrink further, you’re going to have to work smarter.
That's only if people just suddenly stop buying consoles en masse and people on PC just stop buying hw in favor of streaming. For Nintendo it certainly won't be the last one so I doubt it will be so for any of them unless something extreme happens.Next generation is the last one.
Cloud gaming. Which moves power requirements to the cloud and it’s just a question if we can solve latency issues by 2037.
Conceptually, if hardware can't improve then the streaming services will be able to attract people with the better graphics. That could end up a driver towards centralised processing and thin clients. Put the 800W gaming hardware in the cloud, you time-share it 2 hours in an evening, other people use it throughout the day for other workloads, and the heat waste is managed responsibly for heating or energy reclamation of some sort. The limiting factor then would become infrastructure to support low latency communications.That's only if people just suddenly stop buying consoles en masse and people on PC just stop buying hw in favor of streaming. For Nintendo it certainly won't be the last one so I doubt it will be so for any of them unless something extreme happens.
That's only if internet doesn't improve to what's it's been for years which seems more likely than anythingConceptually, if hardware can't improve then the streaming services will be able to attract people with the better graphics. That could end up a driver towards centralised processing and thin clients. Put the 800W gaming hardware in the cloud, you time-share it 2 hours in an evening, other people use it throughout the day for other workloads, and the heat waste is managed responsibly for heating or energy reclamation of some sort. The limiting factor then would become infrastructure to support low latency communications.
In an ideal case, assuming human beings can get their act together!
I think stagnation is what will happen. I think lots of hardware companies will go bankrupt if they cant find other markets to transition into.I wonder what comes after 1nm then. Does technology across the board just stagnate? Surely there have been people thinking about this inevitably for many years.
Graphene chips, quantum computing all seem like concepts we will never see in our lifetimes
900pm (picometer) will be next logical reduction after 1nm but requires a new material. Silicon atoms are approx 2nm so beyond that you need a new material, graphene atoms are 1.6nm and graphene has been widely commercially used since around 2010.I wonder what comes after 1nm then. Does technology across the board just stagnate? Surely there have been people thinking about this inevitably for many years.