I mean, shouldn't it go the other way around? Until CVG can prove their claim, then we should just assume PS3 is on track. Why should Sony "prove" that the article (using the term loosely here) is wrong, other than telling us that PS3 is not delayed?
Now, i'm not disputing that it might actually be delayed, i mean i'd be the LAST to be surprised, i just don't like the fact that when one silly website comes out with a crazy rumour like that, people will just believe it at face value...
Just like we should have never questioned the Spring 2006 launch, World Wide Launch in Fall 2006, 4M units in CY 2006, 2M units in CY 2006, RSX/GDDR3 downclock, whether Motorstorm E3 2005 trailer was realtime, and so forth This would sure be a boring place!
Obviously we should NOT just believe this site out of hand, but there are enough square pegs for square holes to at least consider the possibility. Oh, and someone told me this exact same thing last week on the down low as a strong rumor... CVG just pronounces what others are have already been hearing. Is it legit? We don't know yet, but all the observable evidence gives this rumor some legs unlike much of the other mucking junk that we should just outright dismiss.