CCN-504
Wow, I totally missed the release of that one. Wouldn't have predicted that.
It does make the integration of many ARM cores possible, if not likely.
CCN-504
I think this is stretching it pretty far. "Cores" are pretty unambiguous when talking about Jaguars. I think it is much more likely that either the source is good and it's an IBM CPU, or that the source is bad and it has no value.
IMO
Xbox RT = Phones, Tablets, Setup-Box
Durango = Xbox RT chip, same OS, Apps and casual games as Xbox RT
AND Xbox x64 games
Xbox RT innards:
ARM SOC with 2GB of LDDR3
Durango innards:
ARM SOC with 2GB of LDDR3
AMD SOC with 4GB+ of DDR4
maybe a discrete GPU with faster RAM.
PC = Xbox x64 ports.
IMO
Xbox RT = Phones, Tablets, Setup-Box
Durango = Xbox RT chip, same OS, Apps and casual games as Xbox RT
AND Xbox x64 games
Xbox RT innards:
ARM SOC with 2GB of LDDR3
Durango innards:
ARM SOC with 2GB of LDDR3
AMD SOC with 4GB+ of DDR4
maybe a discrete GPU with faster RAM.
PC = Xbox x64 ports.
Microsoft is building an Xbox set-top box. Multiple sources familiar with Redmond's plans have confirmed to The Verge that the company plans to introduce a low-cost alternative to its Xbox console, designed to provide access to core entertainment services.
The device will run on the core components of Windows 8 and support casual gaming titles rather than full Xbox games typically found on a dedicated console. Although hardware specifications aren't fully locked down, we understand Microsoft will use a chipset to enable an "always on" device that boots quickly and resumes to provide near-instant access to TV and entertainment services.
The move will allow Microsoft to further increase its presence in the living room, providing consumers with a choice between a set-top box or a full next-generation Xbox console. We're told that the set-top box is part of a two-SKU strategy for Microsoft's next-generation of Xbox hardware that will be unveiled in 2013
A lot of the set top box functions, such as "always on" seem to mimic the leaked doc.
Perhaps MS spun the "leaked doc" concepts into two separate boxes, a beefy core focused Durango, and a Xbox lite.
What is the highest BW you can hope if Sony and MS go 256bit DDR3? Would two buses or EDRAM be absolute necessary?
Sony might go with 512bit or higher but microsoft will stay with edram!
lol, I'm honestly shocked if anyone will use even 256bit membus, 128bit 99% surely since 256bit not only brings the costs up a LOT, but also means the chip must be so much bigger even when you shrink it
lol, I'm honestly shocked if anyone will use even 256bit membus, 128bit 99% surely since 256bit not only brings the costs up a LOT, but also means the chip must be so much bigger even when you shrink it
sony has always chosen larger bandwidth over amount of ram . So , its logical that sony will again choose large bandwidth !
larger, why not, 512bit? not a chance. 256bit maybe, 192bit possibly.
Bunk at this point. All the 'big' rumours were bunk. Wii U has no significant strengths. Other than size and power draw.Whatever happened to that 70mb+ EDRAM rumor? Turn out to be bunk or is that size or greater still in the cards?
Bunk at this point. All the 'big' rumours were bunk. Wii U has no significant strengths. Other than size and power draw.