http://sebalza.com/CV2011.pdf
Ubisoft racing game (Ivory Tower, XBOX360,PS3,PS4)
Hmm. I wonder if Xbox is behind..
Ubisoft racing game (Ivory Tower, XBOX360,PS3,PS4)
Hmm. I wonder if Xbox is behind..
http://sebalza.com/CV2011.pdf
Ubisoft racing game (Ivory Tower, XBOX360,PS3,PS4)
Hmm. I wonder if Xbox is behind..
What is ivory tower? Other than the biblical one, i mean
What about Nintendo fanboys?
This thread is so biased. Everybody knows Nintendo put double super secret sauce in the Wuu that will only be revealed this fall to embarass M$ and $ony.
It's because this thread is about next genWhat about Nintendo fanboys?
This thread is so biased. Everybody knows Nintendo put double super secret sauce in the Wuu that will only be revealed this fall to embarass M$ and $ony.
Has anyone bothered to take what we have of the rumors and then ran it past the rendering pipeline and then also considered what parts visually benefit the most from improved performance?
e.g. having 30x more triangle throughput may be nice on paper if your competition only has 10x, but what impact does that have on the final image.
I will toss this out: post processing seems to be an area where major, major wins can be had on game visuals imo. More so than the incremental differences in texture resolution, poly budgets, etc that are being discussed. Just my opinion.
Ps- It is also my opinion we don't know enough about the *final* specs and the architecture to say much as this point. A lot of you are arguing over details secured on shifting sand.
That patent also has app GPU's and cpu's...
Ummm, that hypothetical design already has 2 cpus and 2 gpus. And you are trying to claim it needs another additional chip to support computation...
I think we can all agree that the Sega Saturn proved definitively that more chips=victory.
I think we can all agree that the Sega Saturn proved definitively that more chips=victory.
Posted in the other thread regarding durango but I thought it would add some spice to this one, as well:
Here is the real special sauce guys... Outside of the DMEs and the display plane scalers, there is a monster FPGA, just like I inferred there would be in one of my recent posts:
(...)
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/2012...#ixzz2JcgCTGy1
Image: http://www.faqs.org/patents/imgfull/20120159090_09
Ummm, that hypothetical design already has 2 cpus and 2 gpus. And you are trying to claim it needs another additional chip to support computation...