Sorry, but the horse statue alone appears to have more triangles than all the buildings in the Killzone shot combined.
*merged/spinoff* for the Neverending Killzone Discussion on Graphics
- Thread starter KKRT
- Start date
That's the most absurd statement I've ever heard in this forum, maybe I'll believe you if that horse statue was tessellated in DX11 mode. Anything at that distance can look roundish.
Isn't the geometry info given in the screencap?
I dunno who ct03 is or where he works, but he's got a lot of good observations going on here.
On the other hand it is the illusion that we all in this business are going for. Doesn't matter how we make the audience believe, all that matters is if it works.
It's a lot easier to do though, when the audience wants to be impressed and they're willing to trick themselves.
On the other hand it is the illusion that we all in this business are going for. Doesn't matter how we make the audience believe, all that matters is if it works.
It's a lot easier to do though, when the audience wants to be impressed and they're willing to trick themselves.
As "lots of individual" objects you mean those rocks on the ground and buildings that are looking destroyed?Yea,they are all kind of simple,square like shape.It still looks nice and dense but I think this is what people were saying about making difference.Level design and artstyle.
Add to that destroyed vehicles, intruders, flags, burned trees, flying cruisers, Helghast soldiers and miscellaneous destroyed structures littering around. Yeah, if you played that game you would know every single details and objects that were there and not everything are square and rectangles.
L. Scofield
Veteran
The same applies to C2. Levels are filled with details, from trees, grass, small objects, props, cars, flags, etc...
The comparison shots posted earlier are bad since show a bird's eye view of the KZ3 scene while only ground view for C2.
This video helps with that.
Good idea!!
May be we can make a game with the concept of this thread? So it would be more fun or not…
Lyrics fit this thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTWpc2Q-nDU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sua1u1T-OME
(((interference)))
Veteran
So basically even in this scene there aren't anything close to a million triangles visible?
http://i52.tinypic.com/rhrj2e.jpg
If so, I definitely see how looks can be deceiving in terms of geomety complexity.
MS definitely needs better art for its exclusive titles. As pretty much any gamer would think that KZ or UC push more geometry than Halo Reach etc.
http://i52.tinypic.com/rhrj2e.jpg
If so, I definitely see how looks can be deceiving in terms of geomety complexity.
MS definitely needs better art for its exclusive titles. As pretty much any gamer would think that KZ or UC push more geometry than Halo Reach etc.
I don't think most gamers argue about scene complexity generally speaking. I've seen forum posters talk about things like that when Capcom put out their PR about RE5 and when DF called FF13 simple in terms of geometry, but other than that its not as commonplace as comparing models, textures, commenting on lighting, etc.
I dont know how many polygons it may be pushing but since the camera in the particular picture is viewing most of the scenery from a distance there is an obvious LOD going on that reduces the perceived poly count. Traversing that environment shows the amazing detail of the environment better because not only there is the draw distance, but there are countless of individual and unique objects lying everywhere around you while the environment also boasts great lighting effects, and unbelievable texture variety and quality for a console game.
What if the terrain is small and the boxes are very very big?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked