EB Employee plays PS3

What common sense? Common sense for what? And the developers themselves seem to be saying that they can do things on the PS3 just a tad bit better than the 360 for that same game so....I don't know man.

And it's obvious that the PS3 does have a resolution advantage right now. That much is very obvious.

 

You sir, are a lunatic...

 

PS3 developers? Wow, what a surprise. Cross platform titles that are/were released on 360 first with more time for polish on the PS3? Wow, what a surprise.

Obvious how? 1080p support? I'll give you that one, until it is enabled on the 360 so that both consoles can render equally crappy/cheesy games at 1080p/60. Otherwise, 1080i is the same as 1080p/30.

 

Rainbow Six Vegas Dev comments on 360/PS3 versions:

More comments from the EB Games thingie:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4502474&postcount=300

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4502529&postcount=306

 

I wonder if this distinct PS3 look that keeps being mentioned is simply something like Digital Vibrance rather than some inherent advantage in programmable shader power.

 

Some Virtual Tennis and RR7 is now a crappy/cheesy game?

 

Put VT beside Heavenly Sword. What do you think?

 

I couldn't have put it better myself. And something I'm sure he won't disagree with. Bravo

 

We are comparing a sports game to heavenly sword now? Hell nba2k7 looks amazing but it wouldnt be right to compare it to a game in a completely different genre. Point is, VT3 looks pretty damn good for a game in it's genre (read: tennis/sports games), yeah its not epic action game, but it doesnt need to be.

how stuff like this doesnt look great is beyond me...
http://images.playsyde.com/gallery/public/4089/894_0001.jpg

I mean just look at the comments on this very board when the game was first seen..
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showthread.php?p=742996#post742996
All of a sudden its a crap game, sorry I dont buy that. It's an arcade port yes, but it still looks great.

 

Well, I think I'll spend a hell of a lot more time playing the premier Tennis simulation, Virtua Tennis, then I will HS.

 

360 Screen?

Sure it looks great for a Tennis game (is that really saying much?). But it doesn't hold a candle to the majority of 720p games out there. I wonder why is that? How much better could it have looked if the Devs had focused on beefing up the graphics at 720p resolution instead? Games targeting 1080p resolution are obviously having to make sacrifices and for what?

 

I can't help to think how much Ubi's jocks on MS's NuTs!

 

So now it's smart to compare a sports game to a Action title. Cool.

 

The PS3 has 512 mb of RAM right? Really, and honestly, how hard is it to use XDR via the FLEX I/O? Or is this simply a different case for Ubisoft because they want an easier port and PS3's architecture is turning into a nuissance for them?

 

So now the game looks bad for a next-gen game? God you guys are so predictable.

Maybe it's much harder to make the game look way better than it is to up the resolution. But it's okay because due the higher resolution the graphics now should be compared top premired AAA PS3 titles.

And when did this game started to be looked upon as weak graphically?

 

My bet is on AF it seems to be a reoccurring theme with 360

 

dude... step away from the computer... really

this isn't Neogaf but it's starting to sound like it.

 

Explain why I should "step" away from the computer. You have two guys comparing a tennis game to an action title, yet you tell me to step away from the computer.

 

Did you even read my post? I was comparing resolutions not any specific titles.

If you feel VT is a AAA just because of 1080p be my guest.

 

I don't think VT3 is AAA. But I think it is a great Tennis game that also looks great, that just so happens to be rendered in 1080p.