Flax "Open Source" 3D Engine has now FSR integrated via plugin
Flax 1.2 released
GitHub - FlaxEngine / FidelityFX-FSR
Flax 1.2 released
GitHub - FlaxEngine / FidelityFX-FSR
Last edited:
It is a fact no matter how you'll want to spin it. You get basically the same result as you'd get from system level FSR integration.
It is the only algorithm used for upscaling. You can add any sharpening on top of it on Nv GPU to get the second algorithm used in FSR as well. No idea what "fixed parameter" means.
Nope
5-tap Lanczos filter used by NV scaling method integrated in drivers doesn't provide the same result as EASU which is based on modified 2-tap Lanczos etc.
NV is using simple sharpening filter.
AMD is using Cotrast Adaptive Sharpening via RIS in drivers and enhanced RCAS algorithm is used by FSR
Yeah, 5-tap gives better quality. But the results are close enough anyway because the algorithm is the same.
Nv isn't using anything. A user may use about a dozen or so sharpening filters through drivers, GFE and Reshade, including CAS.
Also do note that "AMD is using" everything in FSR on Nv h/w too. So it's not really a versus scenarios, it's just another bonus for GeForce users.
Yeah, but 5-tap is also much more prone to artifacting etc.
The whole reason why I mentioned that "NV/AMD is using" was because you came with that first
Yeah, well, I consider a system level upscaling of the same variety a close enough solution really since from my own testing so far FSR basically sucks in IQ at any level and I would use it only when there is no other option of improving performance but to lower the resolution - FSR is better than just bilinear upscaling. But this is exactly what GPU scaling on GF does - upscales the lower resolution to your monitor one with Lanczos. Yes, the engine side integration is better since it doesn't affect HUDs and is (presumably) tuned for the game. But since it sucks anyway and is a last resort in getting the performance you want a driver level option is basically the same here (worse artifacting and more user setup needed but compatible with most games from the get go) - and AMD should think about adding it into their drivers really.
Sharpening filters in CP and in Freestyle are both contrast adaptive.
There is a very old, but flexible "Details" filter in Freestyle that is not contrast adaptive (was there way before CAS and the new sharpenning filter), yet it can be adjusted via settings to ignore geometry edges.
Curious as to why you'd need it on a PS3 emulator though... Emulators generally take a lot of CPU power but very little on the GPU front.
Maybe some games are locked to original PS3 resolution? Upscaling them to a modern display with FSR may be an interesting option at least.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
The more GPU they use, the more effective they are AFAIK.
Silent_Buddha
Legend
Not everyone running RPCS3 is using the latest and greatest GPUs. I know some people that run it on integrated GPUs. Maybe I should put run in quotes there.
Regards,
SB
Interesting results. (FXAA+FSR)
edit: remade the image.. there was something funky.
Last edited:
Could you do comparison shots with other scaling options from same scene?
Interesting results. (FXAA+FSR)
FXAA+Integer scaling 3x
NoFXAA+FSR
NoFXAA+Integerscaling 3x
Character shows nicely that AA is mandatory when using FSR, it doesn't really like edges without AA gradients.
Last edited:
Trying to make edges to look sharper on 8bit palette gradients and sharpening filter may both contribute.
Background is also a compressed movie, so identical comparisons are quite hard.
Really like how FXAA fits characters into the backgrounds.
Westwoods stacked 2D vector plane characters had quite strong aliasing in surfaces as well as edges.
Last edited:
