There is no specific PP for a upscaler in order for it to 'upscale'. You understood the context in which I written that. Under no circumstance does it mean some sort of explicit use of this mysterious AMD specific PP
. It's whatever the developer decides to use for it that brings the IQ inline as intended. Just as exampled in Necromunda Hired Gun.Right. And most developers use TAA of varying quality and characteristics. Thus in most games FSR will rely on said TAA to antialias the image before upscaling. So what is your point? That we can't assess the quality of FSR in games with "bad" TAA implementations?
It doesn't disable TAA, it disables user option to disable it. Because you have to use AA for FSR to work correctly. TAA is always active with FSR.
There is no "FSR own implementation" of AA. FSR doesn't have any AA in it.
It is a geometry LOD issue with objects LOD being tied to game's rendering resolution instead of being tied to the output resolution which is the correct way to do it if you're using resolution reconstruction like DLSS or TAAU. Radeon cards will show the same LOD if the game will render in the same resolution - i.e. DLSS Quality vs FSR Quality instead of Q vs UQ.
This is a logical fallacy known as Begging the Question or Circular Argument. The answer was already addressed in my prior response.
Really now? So that explains perfectly why TAA isn't grayed out in Avengers. Because click on the AA option in that game will "mess up" FSR.
Another logical fallacy that doesn't address my response. "I can only hope that we start to see a trend of comparing FSR/DLSS with their own implementation of PP which overrides in game AA as exampled in Necromunda Hired Gun."
That's a long winded way of agreeing that it more then likely is a nvidia driver issue more so then FSR. I don't see this on AMD GPUs.[/QUOTE]
It's is up to the developers to control their game's options when integrating FSR (or DLSS). I'm just translating what AMD's FSR guide has in it.
So the point is as I've said to not assess the quality of FSR in games with "crap" AA. The problem is that nobody will use anything but what there already is in the game and thus FSR will have to work with that and we will check the results regardless. If this will push some devs to implement better AA by default then good for us - but I somewhat doubt this since it would defeat the key advantage of FSR in the first place - ease of integration.Another logical fallacy that doesn't address my response. "I can only hope that we start to see a trend of comparing FSR/DLSS with their own implementation of PP which overrides in game AA as exampled in Necromunda Hired Gun."
Looking for a particular trend in how IQ is compared in upscalers is not an indication AMD having a mysterious PP for FSR. It's implied that higher better/quality PP be used for FSR
Game's choice of geometry LODs is not an Nvidia driver issue.
OGSSAA - just super sample it. Easy.
Wait till you see the prices on these 2.5-3x though.
Why OG when there's RG and SG?
OG is much easier to implement via downsampling is what I was thinking. Just a monitor driver function
Regardless, in either case, the performance impact is generally too large. Although that said, when I was still rocking my V5 5500, I had RGSSAA on all the time. And it's what kept me from buying MUCH faster NV GPUs for quite a long time as well.In the case of Steam Deck, anything that can help those 8CUs at 1-1.6GHz reach great visuals is a welcome addition.
