Xbox Series S [XBSS] (Lockhart) General Rumors and Speculation *spawn*

Discussion in 'Console Industry' started by Jay, Apr 1, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. smithg

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2020
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    39
    Sorry, didn’t realize that wasn’t allowed.

    Not to challenge that or anything, but out of curiosity, weren’t the false next gen specs from ResetEra?
     
  2. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,502
    Likes Received:
    24,397
    The entirely false rumors were from insiders at both of those places. One was far worse than the other.
     
  3. Bickle2

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2020
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    22
    Amazon now shows both Xbox One S as discontinued
     

    Attached Files:

  4. TheAlSpark

    TheAlSpark Moderator
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    22,146
    Likes Received:
    8,533
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ
    It would be kind of awful to have 4 SKUs of "Xbox" simultaneously.
     
    DSoup and AzBat like this.
  5. smithg

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2020
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    39
    The best scenario is definitely for MS to replace the XBox One entirely with Series S at a similar price. If they do that but it’s $299 they would be cutting off their low cost last-gen tail. If they keep around one or two XBO SKUs it would be pretty confusing for the consumer. But Series S at $249 or (probably not) $199 and eliminating XBO would be a great move to build next-gen momentum.
     
    dobwal, cheapchips, mpg1 and 2 others like this.
  6. cheapchips

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,493
    Likes Received:
    2,665
    Location:
    UK
    Wonder what clockspeed they'll choose to run those 20CUs at? I make it:

    5500XT base (1.65GHz) = 4.2TF
    Xbox Series X (1.825GHz) = 4.6TF
    PS5 (2.3GHz) = 5.7TF :roll:

    The first one or slightly lower presumably.
     
  7. eastmen

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    13,878
    Likes Received:
    4,723
    All depends on yields and power targets. I know they are just over 4.2 but i've been told they could get close to 6tflops. S i'm going to go some where between series x clocks and ps5 clocks if yields are good
     
    #727 eastmen, Jul 4, 2020
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2020
    Silenti, BRiT and cheapchips like this.
  8. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,502
    Likes Received:
    24,397
    At same clocks and 24 CUs active, you'd get 5.6 TFs. Sounds close enough to 6? There may only be 20 CUs with none deactivated, depending on yields and configuration.

    There were quite wide ranges of performance targets for LockHart, all depending on what configuration they opt for.
     
    eastmen and cheapchips like this.
  9. dobwal

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    2,324
    Agreed. A low end box allows transitioning to next gen for those who find a $400-$500 price tag not appealing.

    Instead of having a number of gamers still attached to last gen hardware where software supports dwindles every day. You move them over to cheaper next gen hardware where newer next gen software and services can do a better job of enticing them to spend.

    In previous gens you had a ton of gamers sitting on the next gen sideline waiting for hardware to be affordable. Those gamers needed to wait 2-4 years before contributing to revenue of the newer platforms. If you can pull those gamers in at the start of the gen, you can get more gamers spending over the entire life of the console and not the last half or third of the platform’s lifetime.
     
  10. Proelite

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,620
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Location:
    Redmond
    Yep. Lockhart will not have a GPU clock higher than Xsx.
     
  11. Jay

    Jay
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    4,029
    Likes Received:
    3,428
    I believe people thinking that we'll see a 25-50% upclock from the initial design goals are very optimistic.
    I'm expecting a 10-15% upclock if any.
    20% if the yields are truly impressive.
    At the target 1080-1440p that would actually be a fair bit extra TF per pixel especially at 1080p.

    If they had to eat costs to get anywhere close to 50% it would mean they failed in their initial profiling and design, where believing 4TF was enough when xsx is at 12TF.

    Remember when they knew XO was behind, they could only do so much, and this time their not even behind in power.
     
    Proelite likes this.
  12. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,502
    Likes Received:
    24,397
    Sorry, but dont post such low quality rumors, they should not be posted on B3D. Their vetting process mean F-for-all. All their vetted insiders were wrong about hardware specs as well.

    Also, when something is removed at least once, it doesn't mean that you should post it again.
     
  13. mpg1

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2015
    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    1,996
    That's a fairly wide target...
     
  14. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    44,104
    Likes Received:
    16,896
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    To be clear on this point, if something is worth discussing, the Mods will spawn it off into a new thread. If your content is removed and not spawned, it means don't try again.
     
  15. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,502
    Likes Received:
    24,397
    Now, with that said, there may be some concepts that are worth discussing. They were brought to light by other earlier leaks, such as the software dev environment leaks and software release notes leaks. Perhaps this rumor was sparked by those.

    I have posted some possible discussion points in the general thread:

    https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/2137988/
     
  16. eastmen

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    13,878
    Likes Received:
    4,723
    Add 4 cu's to the equation and numbers jump quite quickly
     
    BRiT likes this.
  17. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,502
    Likes Received:
    24,397
    Yup, 4 CUs is an extra 20%. Nothing to sneeze at.
     
  18. cheapchips

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,493
    Likes Received:
    2,665
    Location:
    UK
    Clocks would still have to be higher than XSX to hit 6TF with 24 CUs. Although you could round it up. :)

    upload_2020-7-4_18-42-38.png


    No idea what that means power/heat wise. In principle it doesn't matter, given what they crammed into the OneX, other than the small matter of cost.
     
  19. mpg1

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2015
    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    1,996
    Right....but where are these extra 4 CU's coming from? I thought the rumour was that it was 20 CU's...
     
  20. fehu

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,067
    Likes Received:
    992
    Location:
    Somewhere over the ocean
    Well... if you want to save on mb layout and components, cooling, power unit, size, dices...
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...