expletive said:
1. Again why dont you see what kind of graphics and framerate you get at 1080p before decding if the PS3 is 'future proof' for 1080p.
2. Everyone who buys a PS3 will pay for BR, yet not all of them will use it. Why should Sony care? Force everyone to pay for BR so they can chalk it up on their big "BR Installed Base" scorecard.
3. And? Theres no alien technology at work here. If sony demands 1080p theyll get wahtever eye-candy can be supported at that res, its a balanced equation. And wont it be grand for the 5% that own 1080p televisions who get to actually see what 1080p looks like while the rest live with an effect-starved product jsut so KK can tattoo 1080p across his chest.
1) Why? It can output 1080p. Thats future-proof. Hell it can output dual-1080p, but I don't expect them to support that outside the OS. Oh but now the OS doesn't count I guess.
2) Nope. Developers want Blu-ray, consumers will buy media for it when they support it. How insane would you be to doubt that. Not all, but the majority. And guess what
Blu-ray isn't only Sony, all the other companies that recognise the importance of PS3 do this because of market-research.
3) What is your point? God, no one wants to get into a graphic power showcase with you.
expletive said:
Well then i guess Dell wont be selling a full featured version of Vista then will they? Remember, HP was exclusive once too...
Yep, but Dell has already issued a statement saying they're happy and have no plans to leave. Not to mention Dell is more important to the BDA (founding member) than HP was (general member). And why wouldn't Dell sell it? Suddenly HD-DVD becomes a neccessity to have a "full feature" version of Vista?
"Oh no, I gotta get a HD-DVD drive, don't want the 'tard pack!"
expletive said:
No it IS about Sony too. MS does actually want HD-DVD to win, just so happens if it loses in 2-3 years from now, that works for them too. MS didnt force Sony to put a lot of their eggs in the BR basket, an unfinalized, un-commoditized (?),unlaunched, and uncertain (for either format that is) technology.
Oh great, a Sony is betting the house, death awaits etc. post
MS said they would wait and support the winning format to placate initial consumer fears.
Then they turned around and added the underdog as an add-on when its clear it can't win, only stalemate at best. Yeah, MS really wanted to back them.
Whilst its amusing to argue with you whilst you're on high-damage control mode (and why, since I said this was a non-issue), this arguement is going to go back and forth for a long time if we continue, so I'll bow out.
SMART MOVE MS, YEAH! Who cares if you didn't provide consumers the feature standard because that might cost you money? I sure don't. Consumer choice (and me spending more of my hard-earned) FTW.