Call it the conspiracy theorist in me, but it makes perfect sense there was a concerted effort to rid the whole "Console Forum" experiment once and for all. All "they" needed was a reason. Clearly, there is a group here that are all too eager to see CF go, as it is seen as a "2nd class forum" amongst the more traditional forums (and succeeding to attract far more interest from internetizens than its 2nd class status should deserve). Clearly, there is a group in some other website that would love to infect what was good about CF with their own brand of hostility and bias. So the conspiracy goes that the 1st group all but waves in the 2nd group to do what they do so well, watch as the CF keels over in chaotic paralysis, and then calls it a day for CF. There is no notion of "something lost", or even "something to fight for", rather than "job well done".
Then there is a 3rd group who enjoyed and cherished the unique and dynamic flora that existed in CF (in its better days), that are now displaced. They wish for CF's return, but ultimately, it is an irrelevant wish. The group 1 (who would also comprise "the powers that be") do not care to host resources for the "folly" of CF, hence there is zero incentive to placating what group 3 wishes for, in this respect. It's their website, and they shall do with it as they please.
So we are where we are now, and it all looks completely natural as to the turn of events that described CF's rise and fall.
I do say that the Beyond Consoles sister-site idea (mentioned earlier) sounds like an exciting idea (I said "exciting", not "feasible", for the very same reasons that CF was not to live on).
Also if there is to be a CF return with new moderator/administration structure, I believe there should be additional "checks" in place to keep the mods in check (now don't get all offended by this). It's too easy for even a little bit of power to become corrupt when checks are absent. I'm not saying the mods were corrupt, as the quality of moderatorship is a continuum, not absolutes. I'm just suggesting that the addition of "checks" to greater power (enforced by trusted sr members, perhaps) would keep those who exercise power treading the "proper" line a bit easier.