Ike Turner
Veteran
Time...
Fight Night PS3 Screens
- Thread starter Darkon
- Start date
Time...
mckmas8808
Legend
Nope. More things than time.
That is already one reason. There are more reasons that just that though.
Ike Turner
Veteran
Oh and why didn't they use this new modeling system last year ?
Again....developement time..
mckmas8808
Legend
Yes correct, but it sounds like some people (including myself) want to know specifics.
I think it's not the models or the texture that make this look so much better than the 360 version, but the overall lighting and shading applied to them which gives tham a much more realistic look IMO.
But the AA does seem a little bit too SS to me
But the AA does seem a little bit too SS to me
Last edited by a moderator:
Ike Turner
Veteran
Oh ok. Well I guees that they fine tuned basicaly everything possible compared to the xbox360 version. Better textures,litghing (and anymation hopefully) etc.... Just like all EA sports games FN4 will probably look identical on both consoles next year..
scooby_dooby
Legend
Only when we see FN4 on both systems will we know if that's true.
mckmas8808
Legend
No Tap In had one of the things that made the game look better. I'm NOT saying the system is more powerful.
You're speaking on a different level than others. Others are talking about the root cause. You're talking about the immediate cause. It's pretty easy to infer bias from focusing on the later while skipping the former. It's not always right to do that, but it is pretty easy.
mckmas8808
Legend
I wasn't trying to do anything though. I thought some of the other guys were talking about the immediate cause.
scooby_dooby
Legend
It was the extra time that allowed them to add/refine features. The 2 go hand in hand. What do you think is the result of having more time? Improved systems/features.
mckmas8808
Legend
Exactly I know this. I mean seriously I just said that to Ike Turner like 4 post up. Did you not read the thread?
scooby_dooby
Legend
Well with a multi-platform company like EA, that always stays politically correct, you won't hear much about specifics.
Use your eyes, better lighting, better skin textures, more detail (veins etc) are the main differences.
Well..obviously the PS3 hardware also helped to make this game look better than the 360 version. If and how much that contributed is another question (which can't really be answered right now) You can give EA all the time in the world but they probably won't achieve let alone surpass 360 graphic levels with WII hardware.
mckmas8808
Legend
EA has already told us what the difference were. You just named them, so EA does talk specfics.
And TapIn posted another reason why it's different too.
Oh, I understand that. I'm just trying to explain why you're getting a wall of undesired answers.
scooby_dooby
Legend
OK buddy, whatever you say.
mckmas8808
Legend
What's with you man? I mean it seems like you are trying to fight something that's not there.
For those less interested in the console power/development time semantics... could someone lend some insight on what things they could be using to improve the look of the skin? I read Tap In's post about the new capturing tool they're using, but on the execution level does that involve better textures, improved shading techniques etc? It almost looks like they've got a decent fake of sub surface scattering going on there. The skin of the fighters in the first version is a lot more matte in comparison.
mckmas8808
Legend
The only thing EA has said besides what you already know is this.
That may or may not be a BS answer, but that's what they said. Some unique stuff. Now the only thing that I can think about is that they are using the CELL for certain graphical touches.