Assassin's Creed 2 teaser trailer.

[pjbliverpool]

I'm not sure if they are bullshots or not tbh. There is aliasing in them but its very subtle. There is certainly 4xMSAA at the very least in those shots.

I'm planning to start playing the first game this Friday so i'm quite looking forward to this game too. Will be a while before I play it though, hopefully on a DX11 card

 

[Neb]

I'm not sure if they are bullshots or not tbh. There is aliasing in them but its very subtle. There is certainly 4xMSAA at the very least in those shots.

I'm planning to start playing the first game this Friday so i'm quite looking forward to this game too. Will be a while before I play it though, hopefully on a DX11 card

Lol are you aiming for 2560x1600 32xAA @ 60fps?

 

[pjbliverpool]

Hell yeah! Nah, I won't be going top end, probably more of the 4850 equivilent so i'm hoping for something maybe 20-30-% faster than a 4890 (in either NV or ATI form).

Since my monitor is limited to 1920x1200 I would expect a locked 60fps with 16xQ TMSAA + 16x AF. Thats pretty much perfect playing conditions IMO.

 

[MazingerDUDE]

BTW those are bull shots indeed, but not as blatantly bull as the others, where they use 5120 x 2880 frame buffer super sampled to 720p. This one seems to be roughly 1440 x 900 frame buffer super sampled to 720p. Just slightly bull

With proper 2 x MSAA, the actual game would probably look better than these

 

[pjbliverpool]

No way 720 with 2xMSAA would look that good. Not even close.

 

[Neb]

He maybe meant that Nhancer 2x res rendering and then downsampled.

 

[MazingerDUDE]

1440 x 900 with no AA down to 720p that is

 

[Neb]

1440 x 900 with no AA down to 720p that is

Yeah I spot jaggies though downsampling gives you free TSAA!

 

[MazingerDUDE]

Yeah I spot jaggies though downsampling gives you free TSAA!

TSAA from 20~30% larger frame buffer wouldn't affect nearly as much as 2 x MSAA to IQ IMO

 

[the ignoramus]

Those screenshots are beautiful, are they bullshots? The gameplay video I saw looked all blurry.

It's not bullshot (1440x900) if it's available on PC.

 

[obonicus]

It's not bullshot (1440x900) if it's available on PC.

My thoughts exactly.

 

[ultragpu]

I think it's perfectly fine if the end product is 2xaa at 720p for consoles on a HD TV. BS or not.

 

[Need 2 Know]

Quick Question -

Since AC2 was shown via the Sony Keynote can we expect that the PS3 could be the lead SKU this time round or was that just Sony/Ubisoft PR for the game.

 

[Rangers]

It's not bullshot (1440x900) if it's available on PC.

So these might be PC screens resized to 720P?

 

[Need 2 Know]

Jade Raymond AC2 Interview

Nice little video of the lovely Jade talking about AC2 -

LINK

 

[user542745831]

1440 x 900 with no AA down to 720p that is

16:10 to 16:9?

What about aspect ratio?

 

[MazingerDUDE]

16:10 to 16:9?

What about aspect ratio?

That was just a rough estimate, the exact measurement is 1646 x 926 (9/7 pixel ratio)

 

[dobwal]

Quick Question -

Since AC2 was shown via the Sony Keynote can we expect that the PS3 could be the lead SKU this time round or was that just Sony/Ubisoft PR for the game.

Didn't that happen the last time around?

 

[assurdum]

I don't think there's even a single UBI game without the screen tearing, and it's always been worse on the PS3 as well

Prince of persia level tearing is a lot less of the first AC on the ps3 and comparable with 360 version...far cry 2 not at all, but even less of the AC. AC tearing was more terrible of any ubisoft games.

 

[assurdum]

Didn't that happen the last time around?

For what I remember lead sku of the first AC was 360, prince of persia had lead sku in the ps3.