I dare to disagree. Let me remind the (probably forgotten) AEG case: Long time reputable members were offered free hardware or money to post anti-ATi content.
AMD Vega Hardware Reviews
- Thread starter ArkeoTP
- Start date
Yes, that is true. But that was his first post ever on this forum, after registering on the 14th, the exact same day reviews went out. Ironically, so far he has not contributed with any facts whatsoever, while stating "futile attempts to sway them with either facts, truth or logic". Not the best intro.
Last edited:
Alessio1989
Regular
It would be nice to see the system power usage under idle and common non-intensive application usage... Because a Vega 56 @undervolt could become really interesting..
Ike Turner
Veteran
Refresher for those who weren't born yet..
https://forum.beyond3d.com/threads/nvidia-community-outreach.24489/
And now the thread of discussion that prompted this response has basically disappeared, including the original post by a new user and my reply to him. I expect the remaining bits including this post to be removed shortly or moved to a new thread as well (in case the others were)?
To you, Ike Turner, I guess you forgot or ignored this one? Or your observations are only valid for the green team?
CaptainGinger
Newcomer
There's a "by 32" clock divider, so the potential idle clocks are - on the contrary - extremely low. It seems not to be enabled in all available drivers though.
That's with 17.8.2 Optional, I set the fan rpm manually to a higher level.
That's really nice. I read about the lower clock state for HBM2 but the reviews I saw had 852mhz quoted as the base clock and the idle power draw seemed to back that up. Let's hope these ultra low idle clocks stick around in future drivers.
It's a great card for consumers, if they can get one. It's not such great card for AMD.
They are in the official/optional 17.8.2, not in all the drivers that were floating around during review phase. I guess they are here to stay now.
itsmydamnation
Veteran
So one thing i just noticed,
eyefinity idle clocks
core: 35-70mhz
memory clock: 167mhz
that is a massive improvement over my 290.
here is some partial data:
this is extreme default ( 1600x900) , sry for poor formatting
eyefinity idle clocks
core: 35-70mhz
memory clock: 167mhz
that is a massive improvement over my 290.
here is some partial data:
this is extreme default ( 1600x900) , sry for poor formatting
Code:
settings Heaven 4.0 Heaven 4.0 no aa Heaven 4.0 16x tess Heaven 4.0 16x tess no aa H4 2x tess
default 2443 3404 2437 3424 2949
Default +50 2456 2448 3539 3045
uv1
uv2
uv3 2374 3301
oc1
oc2
oc3 2520 2598 3618 3229
mem0c1 2518 2519 3436 3179
mem0c2
mem0c3 2753 2699 3756 3355
Code:
Stage 6 volt Stage 7 clock power
uv1 1050 1100 0
uv2 1030 1080 0
uv3 1030 1080 50
Stage 6 volt Stage 6 clock Stage 7 volt Stage 7 clock power fan target
oc1 1602 1702 50
oc2 1100 1602 1150 1650 50 3840
oc3 1080 1602 1110 1650 50 3840
Stage 6 volt Stage 6 clock Stage 7 volt Stage 7 clock power fan target mem voltage memory clock
memoc1 1537 1592 0 2400 auto 900
mem0c2 auto 1602 auto 1702 50 3840 auto 900
memoc3 1040 1602 1080 1650 50 3840 auto 900
memoc3 1040 1602 1080 1650 50 3840 900 900Yay for you, @Lightman!
Still waiting for news of the ASUS Strix vega edition. Nothing whatsoever so far... Oh well, we're not even a whole week into september! So after waiting until june for the Vega unveil, and then until siggraph for another unveil, and then until august for RX edition, and now at some nebulous point this month... Can't remember last time there was a GPU launch that involved quite this much waiting!
Still waiting for news of the ASUS Strix vega edition. Nothing whatsoever so far...
Oh well, we're not even a whole week into september! So after waiting until june for the Vega unveil, and then until siggraph for another unveil, and then until august for RX edition, and now at some nebulous point this month... Can't remember last time there was a GPU launch that involved quite this much waiting!itsmydamnation
Veteran
So just flash 56 to 64. It's very interesting, the latest update to gpuz is also very helpful in understanding Vega and vega56 voltage tdp and cloking behaviour.
When not on a mobile device I will post my findings/thoughts
When not on a mobile device I will post my findings/thoughts
itsmydamnation
Veteran
So i have time for a 5 minute post.
So the conclusion i have reached is that Vega 56 is a TDP limited card 100% of the time. This limit is 200watts for the GPU. The stock voltages will always make you TDP bound. Because of this the only way to increase clock is to lower voltage. changing the power slider away from 0 seems to change clocking behavior and enable higher clocks but you will never go above 200watts for the GPU regardless of how many points you are positive. So then it becomes clocks vs under volting, but then vega seems self aware in what it can handle and only tries to keep to what clock/voltage settings you have set, it will happily go nowhere near stupid settings.
So when you flash your Card to 64 all that changes is that TDP limit, what i found is my highest clock/lowest voltage settings on 56 was consuming around 200 watt on 64 ( this just under 1600mhz). At this point i can start uping both voltage and clocks on 64 and before i had to go to work i was just under 1700mhz consuming mid 250watt on the GPU.
So the conclusion i have reached is that Vega 56 is a TDP limited card 100% of the time. This limit is 200watts for the GPU. The stock voltages will always make you TDP bound. Because of this the only way to increase clock is to lower voltage. changing the power slider away from 0 seems to change clocking behavior and enable higher clocks but you will never go above 200watts for the GPU regardless of how many points you are positive. So then it becomes clocks vs under volting, but then vega seems self aware in what it can handle and only tries to keep to what clock/voltage settings you have set, it will happily go nowhere near stupid settings.
So when you flash your Card to 64 all that changes is that TDP limit, what i found is my highest clock/lowest voltage settings on 56 was consuming around 200 watt on 64 ( this just under 1600mhz). At this point i can start uping both voltage and clocks on 64 and before i had to go to work i was just under 1700mhz consuming mid 250watt on the GPU.
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
ASUS Radeon ROG RX Vega 64 STRIX 8GB review
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/asus-radeon-rog-rx-vega-64-strix-8gb-review,1.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/asus-radeon-rog-rx-vega-64-strix-8gb-review,1.html
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
AMD marketing feeling the "heat" and attempting to cast doubt on reviews? Seems that's what Hilbert may be thinking based on some comments posted about the Guru3D Strix RX Vega 64 review.
https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/r...-vega-64-strix-8gb.416698/page-2#post-5469841
itsmydamnation
Veteran
So I just noticed that after flashing my Vega 56, my mtu count is now 232 not 224, what's a good way to test mtu throughput?
gamervivek
Regular
AT used 3dmark vantage tests earlier for pixel and texel throughputs. You can use that but would need a reference as well.
Similar threads
