AMD: R8xx Speculation

How soon will Nvidia respond with GT300 to upcoming ATI-RV870 lineup GPUs

  • Within 1 or 2 weeks

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Within a month

    Votes: 5 3.2%
  • Within couple months

    Votes: 28 18.1%
  • Very late this year

    Votes: 52 33.5%
  • Not until next year

    Votes: 69 44.5%

  • Total voters
    155
  • Poll closed .
Well, if you're a DIY guy, you can always disassemble few monitors and make a new, borderless version out of 'em ;)
 
"Because we support GPU-accelerated physics, our $129 card that’s shipping today is faster than their new RV870 (code name for new AMD chips) that sells for $399." - nVidia

:rolleyes:


"President and CEO of NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) Jen Hsun Huang sells 260,475 shares of NVDA on 09/11/2009 at an average price of $16.07 a share." (link)

:oops:


Well I didn't think it'd be long before the FUD campaign got going but that's just embarassing. Really now, this is Sony level spin.
 
I think Juniper is 256bit and Cypress 512bit. I hope im right :D
Hmm, with Cypress coming in 1GB and 2GB configurations...

But Juniper being 256-bit is hardly economical and wouldn't be a replacement for RV740.

On the other hand, if there is a chip between Juniper (256-bit) and Cedar (64-bit), then it (Redwood) sorta makes sense as the 128-bit replacement for RV740.

This patent, in theory, would allow for a radical increase in I/O density:

http://v3.espacenet.com/publication...T=D&date=20090205&CC=US&NR=2009032941A1&KC=A1

since power can be routed across the outside of the GPU chip. This means that power for the peripheral areas of the chip can be routed from central areas of the chip. This then means that the peripheral areas of the chip, where the I/O lives, don't lose balls to power. All the balls can be I/O.

Jawed
 
Hmm, with Cypress coming in 1GB and 2GB configurations...

But Juniper being 256-bit is hardly economical and wouldn't be a replacement for RV740.

On the other hand, if there is a chip between Juniper (256-bit) and Cedar (64-bit), then it (Redwood) sorta makes sense as the 128-bit replacement for RV740
HD5870 2GB has 16 memory modules: 16x Samsung GDDR5 K4G10325FE:

http://www.wsgfmedia.com/generaladmission/pics/3x2setup-card.jpg
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/productList.do?fmly_id=675

16pcs of 32bit modules could be used for 512bit configuration, but the GPU is only < 340 mm² large, so 256bit clamshell configuration (like FS9270) seems to be more likely.

Anyway, official slide says nothing about memory bus:
http://www.abload.de/img/2ym9i.jpg
 
That's true, but if the bus were 512 bit they'd probably be advertising their crazy 250+GB/s bandwidth on the official slides.
 
I'm very skeptical to 512bit theory, but just imagine a hypotetical situation: ATi wants to release a 512bit part, but they want surprise us (not to shout about 512bit bus and cause exaggerated expectation as in R600 times) - what would be the best strategy? To avoid any mention of bus width, any mention of bandwidth and speak only about capacity and clock speed. And use a configuration, which could be explained alternatively: as a 256bit clamshell.
 
That's true, but if the bus were 512 bit they'd probably be advertising their crazy 250+GB/s bandwidth on the official slides.

Why would they. It's supposed to be a secret weapon.
Remember, 'dominate' is going to have a new meaning! :)

Where does the Eyefinity power come from?
 
Back
Top