Top MS Executive PR

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he was saying 4.5 months, as in many Sony fans are hopinh for March. And he was saying "Ya right...not gonna happen"

July IHO is more realistic.

edit - too late ;)
 
Sony has already said - multiple times - that the PS3 will launch 'Spring' of 06 in Japan, so if nothing else, whether it has one game or two, I'm just going to assume a spring '06 launch for the PS3. A March or April launch before 'Golden Week' in Japan makes the most sense.
 
scooby_dooby said:
Common sense tells you that sony will launch in Japan anyways, so it's not comparable to MS's worldwide launch.

Sony can afford to launch in Japan with a much weaker line-up than MS requires to pull of a NA/EU/JAP launch.

In reality, Sony doesn't really need to start showing playable games until summer next year, to start gearing up for the worldwide launch in fall.

They are probably a 'little' worried about X360 in Japan though, because that domination has formed the backbone of their superior Japanese support, I'm sure they would not be happy to see X360 make signifigant inroads into their main territory.

At this point priority #1 for Sony is slowing adoption of X360, mainly in japan IMO

Dude...Dude.

If MS wants to they can launch with a weaker lauch line up too. After all they'll have time until Sony launch. [Then again we don't know if MS will line up a weak launch]

..and this assumption of yours about Sony's world wide launch in Fall. Nobody knows Sonys plans.

Japan for the most part is Sony's to lose.

Common sense...is not so common, here.
 
scooby_dooby said:
I think he was saying 4.5 months, as in many Sony fans are hopinh for March. And he was saying "Ya right...not gonna happen"

July IHO is more realistic.

edit - too late ;)

Sorry Sony (you know the people that actually knows what's going on) has already said Spring 2006. So looks like so far your opinion is based on nothing, making it not an opinion just a wrong comment.
 
mckmas8808 said:
Sorry Sony (you know the people that actually knows what's going on) has already said Spring 2006. So looks like so far your opinion is based on nothing, making it not an opinion just a wrong comment.

Well June 20th is still technically spring, which is less than 2 weeks away from july.
 
mckmas8808 said:
Yet still not July so no go. He's still wrong.

Well he's guessing at a future event, he's not wrong until the ps3 is released; presuming that is sometime before july.
 
mckmas8808 said:
WOW! I didn't know KZ for the PS3 looked bad after released.:oops: Hey jvd where did you play it man? Where did you get a PS3 from and where do you live? I will take the first flight straight to your town.
no ones played it cause its cgi as the developer said it was .

So do you think the ps3 is going to do better than the cgi shown ?

If you believe it then my point stands that sony can get away with it but ms would be called on it .
 
jvd said:
no ones played it cause its cgi as the developer said it was .

So do you think the ps3 is going to do better than the cgi shown ?

If you believe it then my point stands that sony can get away with it but ms would be called on it .

Yes I do think that games will look better than the KZ video shown on both the Xbox 360 and PS3. That's my point.

AlphaWolf said:
Well he's guessing at a future event, he's not wrong until the ps3 is released; presuming that is sometime before july.

Ok and Halo 3 will be released in 2009. I can make a future guess too.
 
Yes I do think that games will look better than the KZ video shown on both the Xbox 360 and PS3. That's my point.
and i don't , kz is cgi . We are talking about games .

Sony showed the kz video. My point is if we don't get graphics like that its okay , sony will not be blamed and fan boys will gloss over it . HOwever if it was ms sony fan boys would be all over ms just ilke they were with the raven demo .

There are still people glossing over the "tech demos " from the ps2 launch like the face and claiming games came close to it when they didn't .
 
IMO, everything up until 11/22 is meaningless. All the CGI, the posturing, everything. I think what really matters is going to be the 2nd wave of games from MS. They'll clearly sell through initial shpiments easily but maintaining interest into 2006 and up to the PS3 launch will be the real key. The really need GoW and something else (too human/mass effect ?) (EDIT: or Halo 3- duh) to be console selling AAA titles to really turn up the heat. I also think the general date will be irrelevant but if Sony launches at anything over $450 it will have a direct affect on sales imo.

BTW i saw the 360 today in NYC, much smaller than i thought it would be. Nothing playable unfortunately but the demo was decent. I had a bad seat off to the side so i didnt have a great view but the games both looked better in person than any videos i had seen (PGR3 and Kameo).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jvd said:
and i don't , kz is cgi . We are talking about games .

Sony showed the kz video. My point is if we don't get graphics like that its okay , sony will not be blamed and fan boys will gloss over it . HOwever if it was ms sony fan boys would be all over ms just ilke they were with the raven demo .

There are still people glossing over the "tech demos " from the ps2 launch like the face and claiming games came close to it when they didn't .

jvd this is the thing that I don't understand about you and others that feel like you. Why do you and others think that next-gen starts and ends with Gears of War and PGR3? Games in 2008+ will crush those two from both systems. You have to let some improvement set into your mind about next-gen possibilities.

P.S. If you notice in the KZ video the buildings and ground wasn't that all impressive.
 
jvd this is the thing that I don't understand about you and others that feel like you. Why do you and others think that next-gen starts and ends with Gears of War and PGR3? Games in 2008+ will crush those two from both systems. You have to let some improvement set into your mind about next-gen possibilities.

P.S. If you notice in the KZ video the buildings and ground wasn't that all impressive.

No that is what you don't get .

I'm not one to believe cgi passed off as what these consoles can do . I want to see real games and not hey here is some cgi buy this system and mabye one day if your lucky this will happen .

So far the ps3 has shown me nothing of what its capable of , its just been smoke and mirrors while those games u mentioned have been played and if quality increases that is a good thing. But i'm not expecting cgi to suddenly become real time just because sony tried to pass it off as in game stuff
 
jvd said:
No that is what you don't get .

I'm not one to believe cgi passed off as what these consoles can do . I want to see real games and not hey here is some cgi buy this system and mabye one day if your lucky this will happen .

So far the ps3 has shown me nothing of what its capable of , its just been smoke and mirrors while those games u mentioned have been played and if quality increases that is a good thing. But i'm not expecting cgi to suddenly become real time just because sony tried to pass it off as in game stuff

This is based off your assumption that the PS2 didnt live up to its tech demos right? I especially like how you just whitewashed over MGS4, Gundam, I-8, and Heavenly Sword to name but a few. You seem to be looking for an excuse to pass off Sony rather than asking why you're seeing 'approximations' for games not due for release for at least 12 months from when their trailers were shown.
 
Mmmkay said:
This is based off your assumption that the PS2 didnt live up to its tech demos right? I especially like how you just whitewashed over MGS4, Gundam, I-8, and Heavenly Sword to name but a few. You seem to be looking for an excuse to pass off Sony rather than asking why you're seeing 'approximations' for games not due for release for at least 12 months from when their trailers were shown.

none of which are at the quality lvl of killzone .

No where near killzone .
 
Mmmkay said:
Nothing is, that doesnt mean everything else Sony showed no longer exists.

and what is your point .

My point is that sony can show cgi and not have any problems basicly get away with doing it . But when ms showed raven they got bashed for it .

That is the ponit . What your talking about has nothing to do with what i said .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top