i have a cooler master cosmos c700p
yes all good advice, but one should also rtfm for the thing you have because it can be different per mobo or aio manufacturer
www.purepc.pl
www.computerbase.de
As per forum rules in A&PSeems the performance of Starfield has normalized between vendors after several patching. That latest round of testing (during the 4070TiS reviews) shows that at 4K, the 7900XTX is 5% to 8% faster than 4080, and the 4090 is 22% to 28% faster than 7900XTX. On contrary to initial results, which showed the 7900XTX faster than both.
Geforce RTX 4070 Ti Super mit Performance-Problemen? Eine (Ent)Warnung im Vorab-Test
Vorläufige Spiele-Benchmarks & Leistungsindexwww.pcgameshardware.de
Test wydajności NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. Będzie SUPER skoro dostała 16 GB pamięci? | PurePC.pl
Test wydajności NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. Będzie SUPER skoro dostała 16 GB pamięci? (strona 13) Test wydajności kart graficznych NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. Test wydajności ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GamingNvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super im Test: Die einzelnen Spiele-Benchmarks mit und ohne RT
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super im Test: Die einzelnen Spiele-Benchmarks mit und ohne RT / Gaming-Benchmarks in 3.840 × 2.160
the idea here is not to circumvent the A&P rules by posting it elsewhere. So I’m applying those rules here in the game forums as well.
That doesn't make sense since we already had that type of discussion in other forums. It is not circumventing any rules since the general forum rules apply. It you want to make a blanket statement regarding A&P rules apply to all forums then you should do so.
the aspect I’m looking for here is:
It is technically substantive in that performance has improved for Nvidia product since the game was released, according to more that one review. Indicating the performance swing percentages from the reviews is more proof that there has been a decent uplift. It can't be in a "good way" for both products, it's usually for one or the other.
I edited out the cross vendor comparisons all together.
You're absolutely right. A vs B or B vs A is too easy. But if you draw that line of thinking out of the box, you can find something positive there for both A and B, despite the results, or you add in some findings that is certainly more useful than just A vs B. Then no one will say anything, in fact, readers are going to really respect the additional level of insight you're bringing to the posts.
thanks appreciate it. I also think a improvement comparison between 4090 launch to 4090 today on Starfield would have also been pretty useful number to show how far optimization has come. I am interested to know what was changed from launch to today as well, or what was optimized, or what the bottleneck was on nvidia.
Yeah, that's the reason why I posted these results in the first place, the Creation engine was vendor neutral for as long as it existed (Skyrim, Fallout 4, Fallout 76, .. etc), it was sometimes even strongly in favor of NVIDIA GPUs (due to more effecient DX11 CPU code If I remember correctly). So, for it to reverse course in it's newest iteration (Creation 2) like that, is a huge question mark. It suggests a serious bottleneck in the code.
This was such a fun time in PC graphics. Here's Humus' site if anyone wants to go down memory lane. I didn't realize he was still making demos up until 2019!
They are really going to try no mans sky this arn't they, I appreciate them not just dumping it and running but i'm not sure they can get it to the place that will satisfy the most vocal critics. I'll jump back in when they release an expansion.
