I'm honest, I don't know if you're trolling.This remake looks so good, it's the original game sublimated, can't wait !
Then please read this thread since the beginning and reread after that what you just said... You'll understand.no ! last time i played it was 2005, so i'm very happy to play this remake.
In my opinion the original game aged badly even if the magic still remains, and this remake is perfect for another playthrough !
They're video games. The visual aesthetics matter. Obviously not to everybody though.
He didn't say they are just "video", he said "video games". He said that video was an important part, not all. He didn't deny the interactive part, neither in an explicit nor in an implicit way.That’s a crap argument. They are more than video of course. There is inherently an interactive element you ignore by claiming they are video. It’s like claiming a meal sucks because it looks better on the menu but you haven’t even eaten it yet.
Derp.
He didn't say they are just "video", he said "video games". He said that video was an important part, not all. He didn't deny the interactive part, neither in an explicit nor in an implicit way.
True, but if you think he had a wrong assumption, I don't think the best way to reply is doing exactly the same.And not a soul here has ever implied the “video” aspect is irrelevant.
Then please read this thread since the beginning and reread after that what you just said... You'll understand.
True, but if you think he had a wrong assumption, I don't think the best way to reply is doing exactly the same.
This thread has become a true battle of opinions regarding the "new" looks of this game. The fact that you said "This remake looks so good, it's the original game sublimated" could look like a direct attack/reference to OCASM's opinion and like you're making fun of what this thread has become. Not in a bad way, per se. I found it quite funny, in fact.i'm sorry but i don't understand what you mean ? could you enlighten me ?
Uhm... okay, let's leave it at that. ;-)His reply was downplaying and ignoring the argument that a game has to be felt to understand the whole vision. He counters with video.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
This thread has become a true battle of opinions regarding the "new" looks of this game. The fact that you said "This remake looks so good, it's the original game sublimated" could look like a direct attack/reference to OCASM's opinion and like you're making fun of what this thread has become. Not in a bad way, per se. I found it quite funny, in fact.
The whole discussion is about the visual aesthetics. I don't know why you tried to make it about gameplay. Then again BP made changes to the controls...His reply was downplaying and ignoring the argument that a game has to be felt to understand the whole vision. He counters with video.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Nah, I have no problem with people liking this. It's actually other people who have a problem with me disliking it and keep making all kinds rationalizations to justify the aesthetic changes/failings instead of simply acknowledging them and moving on.yes i was partly joking about that, and the funny thing is that we"re both right !
i respect his opinion but sometimes he can sound like nobody should like this remake.
As for your comparison, having to use the worst possible screenshot from the original game, running on an emulator with post-processing effects disabled, just says it all, doesn't it?
There's no contradiction. What I said is that the game has both a realistic core and some surrealist elements. It's not one or the other.
Compare it to the picture of the real cliff you posted.
The whole discussion is about the visual aesthetics. I don't know why you tried to make it about gameplay.
Since you continue to ignore my arguments I'll simply ignore youIt is supposed to be the PS3 version... maybe this one is better :
Yes there is a contradiction, because everything looks more realistic in the remake... once again, the pictures i posted speak for themselves.
Give me one element that look more realistic in the PS2 version aside some rare animations ?
Indeed, the completely flat rocks in the original game look so much more real than this :
https://forum.beyond3d.com/goto/post?id=2020899#post-2020899Because the thread is about the game, not just the visuals. Besides, I already gave my opinion of the visuals.
Since you continue to ignore my arguments I'll simply ignore you