Rumble Roses developer on PS3 & X360

onetimeposter said:
I think its time to realise that ATI has hit the nail on its head with Xenos. its a beast and the future of GPU , atleast for ATI. Xenos theoritically and technically is better and faster than RSX ingame

I think we can wait for some real benchmarks before jumping to conclusions.

Not to mention, we don't have final specs for RSX.
 
scooby_dooby said:
ya because having 1 or 2 threads going at once is totally comparable to 9 at the same time...:rolleyes:
quit it.

having a main core coupled with mini-cores its a DESIGN. EE and CELL share the same principle design.
threads number of Cores, mean nothing here.

9800pro has 8 pipelines.... G70 as 24pipelines. They share the same design. By your words, they are completely different just because G70 pipelines are advanced...

thats what i need now... just quit it ok
 
mckmas8808 said:
Me and a couple of other people are disappointed in you Jawed. Tell me where your hidden information is at about the RSX. We would like to see it.

:oops: Unbelievable. Unfreakingbelievable....
 
onetimeposter said:
shader 3.0 24 pipes

link me...... dont botther, such information DOES NOT EXIST

quit making stuff up..... just because G70 has a 24/8 pipes/shadders its does not mean RSX will have the same stuff
 
mckmas8808 said:
Me and a couple of other people are disappointed in you Jawed. Tell me where your hidden information is at about the RSX. We would like to see it.

ofcourse you are, you and a couple of others from GAF forums have essentially made it a mission to diss anything Xbox and Praise anything PS3. its a fact. the mods will speak of that, I know i like Xbox 360 more but I dont Bash ps3.
 
dskneo said:
link me...... dont botther, such information DOES NOT EXIST

quit making stuff up..... just because G70 has a 24/8 pipes/shadders its does not mean RSX will have the same stuff

google it. its the best search engine available. I shouldnt type FOR you.
 
you reaction makes me happy..... because there is not a single bit of information about the number of pipelines/shadders of RSX.

not a bit.
 
dskneo said:
you reaction makes me happy..... because there is not a single bit of information about the number of pipelines/shadders of RSX.

not a bit.

Xenos will be technically and theoritically faster than RSX.

The Standard has been set for this generation. The next Standard will be either from Revolution or next next generation
 
onetimeposter said:
Xenos will be technically and theoritically faster than RSX.

Could you give an in depth post on how the Xenos will be both Technically and theoritically faster than the RSX? In your own words?
 
BlueTsunami said:
Could you give an in depth post on how the Xenos will be both Technically and theoritically faster than the RSX? In your own words?


ive been explaining since alot of pages ago. look back. unless you can tell me how a higher clocked g70 varient will be faster and better than Xenos. look at Jaweds assessment
 
onetimeposter said:
Xenos will be technically and theoritically faster than RSX.

The Standard has been set for this generation. The next Standard will be either from Revolution or next next generation

someone care to comment?

looooooooool :D

i knew it.... just because you dont understand the conditions in which the sentence "set a new standard" is applied, you automaticly think that just because he said X360 and no PS3, that the PS3 is out!
funny thing is, you dismiss Ps3 but you accept the revolution as a contender.

If you believe the DEV so much (in a twisted kind of way), heres what the Dev also said about PS3 vs X360:
GI: What do you think you could pull off on one system that you could not on another?

Uchida: I think there are some things you can do with the PS3 than you cannot with the 360. The processing speed is much quicker. The rendering variation that the PS3 offers is wider. But the online of the 360 is amazing and is probably better than the PS3.
so.... you believe him about that Standard thing (in a twisted kind of way, and false btw), but you think he is lying about the last part.

ironic
 
onetimeposter said:
ive been explaining since alot of pages ago. look back. unless you can tell me how a higher clocked g70 varient will be faster and better than Xenos. look at Jaweds assessment

I'm asking to consolidate all your info into one post...instead of one liners adapting to each and every post thrown at you. The reason Jawed and other poster such as him are very informative is because they devulge all the needed info in one post....instead of scattering it. Also...in your own words..instead of Jawed's because you seem to portray that you know alot about the RSX and Xenos.

You don't have to do it...its just a request but i'll understand if you can't expain it yourself and parrot other posters.
 
one said:
With 16 texture units?

from the b3d article:

There are both 16 texture fetch units (filtered texture units, with LOD) and 16 vertex fetch units (unfiltered / point sample units) giving 16 of each type of texture samplers. Note that as the output data from the texture samplers is supplied to the unified shader arrays both types of texture lookups are available to either Vertex or Pixel Shader programs, if needed, and there are no limitations on the number of dependant texture reads. All of the texture address processing is handled locally by the texture processing array with each texture unit having its own texture address processor, so this is functionality that does not consume any cycles in the ALU shader array.


you should read the rest of the b3d article
 
dskneo said:
quit it.

having a main core coupled with mini-cores its a DESIGN. EE and CELL share the same principle design.
threads number of Cores, mean nothing here.

9800pro has 8 pipelines.... G70 as 24pipelines. They share the same design. By your words, they are completely different just because G70 pipelines are advanced...

thats what i need now... just quit it ok

lol, so any single-core coupled to multiple cores is now IYO considered "old" technology? That criteria is ridiculously broad.

Give me a break man.

AMD and Intel's timelines don't launch these types of CPU's till when? 2009-2010? And somehow you can twist this with bizarre logic to be old technology?



Done arguing with you, you can't even admit the simple fact that the CELL processor is much more advanced thinking design than the VERY conventional XeCPU, i believe "known iside and out" was the exact phrase you used. If you can't even admit that simple reality how could I possibly expect you to look logically at other more subjective details.

I was simply pointing out the complete and utter hypsocrisy in your arguments against Xenos, and I think I've made my point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top