I thought PS2's price remained the same? But even if it didn't, the response due to the form factor was tremendous, and Sony may have picked up on that. Then again this new PS3skinny isn't anything like as classy as the PS2slim.
A flash-based PS3 could get that small again.
Apparently not:
" Users can also expand the storage capacity of the new PS3 with 12GB flash memory by connecting a dedicated HDD (250GB) to be released concurrently with the new PS3 *1"
"*1 When using dedicated HDD, flash memory cannot be used as inner storage"
http://www.develop-online.net/press-releases/91110/PlayStation-3
Yes but it's only optional. From the EU PS3 Blog:Sounds like a proprietary hard drive? If so I hope it isn't a new trend. From the link:
"* The“Dedicated HDD(250GB) for PlayStation®3” is for the new PS3 system (CECH-4000A) and cannot be used on the other models."
Yes but it's only optional. From the EU PS3 Blog:
"and owners of the 12GB model will be able to connect a 2.5 inch SATA internal hard drive with use of an official Mounting Bracket, or opt for purchase of an official PlayStation 250GB internal HDD"
http://blog.eu.playstation.com/2012/09/19/ps3-gets-smaller-and-lighter/
Yes but it's only optional. From the EU PS3 Blog:
"and owners of the 12GB model will be able to connect a 2.5 inch SATA internal hard drive with use of an official Mounting Bracket, or opt for purchase of an official PlayStation 250GB internal HDD"
http://blog.eu.playstation.com/2012/09/19/ps3-gets-smaller-and-lighter/
But you have to buy a official Mounting Bracket (10/20€ ?)… Sony seem to learn from the 360 arcade, but not totally.
This one actually has smaller footprint. The older slim is like bigger in one dimension compare to the fat model. I just don't like the ridges, that's going to be hard to wipe dust of it.
But I prefer the top loading, instead of slot loading. Never was a fan of slot loading. Price a little too high. Probably will pick the 500GB up when price drop.
If you look at the skinny in profile, you see those ridges aren't square cut, but very small, rounded peaks like waves. There are no corners for dust to get stuck in, in contrast to PS2's square ridges around it.This one actually has smaller footprint. The older slim is like bigger in one dimension compare to the fat model. I just don't like the ridges, that's going to be hard to wipe dust of it.
It looks good to me too. The problem I find with this new model is that it isn't only more expensive than the current slim featuring a much bigger hard-drive, but I thought this new model was part of a move to rival Nintendo WiiU in price, but seeing this, this theory doesn't hold water.I actually don't have any issues with it's looks. Quite neat actually, though I should see it in person.
John Koller said:Power consumption is 190 watts. I think we're down a little bit. It's a more efficient unit. It has a different fan, which allowed us to shrink down the overall size of the shell.