(((interference)))
Veteran
Yeah, or he didn't want to risk being too specific.That I agree with because as you see I even told him that didn't sound impressive. But yeah in hindsight he was probably playing it safe since at the time they probably didn't know the exact performance nor bothered to look closer at it like we would.
Well DaE was saying that it was Intel and Nvidia, but now it's obvious he was just leading us on:Well Intel was supposedly never in the picture. And both consoles are supposedly using Jaguar cores now. But this to me does point so far to similar performance.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-the-curious-case-of-the-durango-devkit-leak
DaE reckons that the current devkits were dispatched to studios in February, and feature Intel CPUs and a graphics card that carries the NVIDIA brand - but he doesn't identify either part more specifically. He also claims that the Durango kit features more than 8GB of memory (other sources have suggested 12GB), and that it is 64-bit in nature - at this point it's worth bearing in mind that dev hardware typically features double the RAM of retail kit in order to accommodate debugging tools and other systems. DaE also says that Microsoft is targeting an eight-core CPU for the final retail hardware - if true, this must surely be based around Atom architecture to fit inside the thermal envelope. The hardware configuration seems difficult to believe as it is so divorced from the technological make-up of the current Xbox 360, and we could find no corroborative sources to establish the Intel/NVIDIA hook-up, let alone the eight-core CPU