Predict: The Next Generation Console Tech

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure most HD people will have one BRD player by then, but how many of us have more than one DVD playing device that's used? Lots of people! DVD/BRD players, laptios, consoles, portable players. One is never enough! As I say, it's added value. If a BRD player costs $100, then having that in your console is a $100 feature, as it were. If you're going to have an Hd optical format, it's almost certain to be BRD, and if it is, then you may as well provide BRD playback for minimal effort.

A $100 feature is never $100 value overall when bundled with a system which does other things. On average it has to be less than that because otherwise Sony would have completely blitzed Microsoft with their $400 then $300 then $200 etc value Blu Ray drive.
 
when did this happen ? I don't see why DD can't deliever 3d movies. Cable/fios/sat also deliever 3d movies

They don't own the content, movie studios do and they have no intention of releasing 3D movies on anything other than BD, just like they have no intention to have 1080p content available for DD.

Next gen games are prolly going to be 1080p standard right? It would seem strange that a console which is also supposed to be a media center cannot play the only legitimate delivery vehicle for 1080p and 3D content.
 
They don't own the content, movie studios do and they have no intention of releasing 3D movies on anything other than BD, just like they have no intention to have 1080p content available for DD.

Next gen games are prolly going to be 1080p standard right? It would seem strange that a console which is also supposed to be a media center cannot play the only legitimate delivery vehicle for 1080p and 3D content.

You can download/stream 1080p movies on the 360.
 
They don't own the content, movie studios do and they have no intention of releasing 3D movies on anything other than BD, just like they have no intention to have 1080p content available for DD.

Next gen games are prolly going to be 1080p standard right? It would seem strange that a console which is also supposed to be a media center cannot play the only legitimate delivery vehicle for 1080p and 3D content.

You sure about that . Pretty sure zune stuff on the 360 is 1080p

With the release of the Zune 4.0 software update, Microsoft added movies to the Zune Marketplace's existing selection of TV shows, podcasts, and music videos. At the same time, Zune became the video provider for Xbox 360. Videos purchased on Xbox 360 can also be viewed on PCs and Zune devices.[72] Zune Marketplace also offers HD content. Zune Marketplace on Xbox 360 offers 5.1 surround-sound and 1080p instant streaming on a selection of titles. Content can be either purchased or rented.[73] Zune Marketplace TV shows come from:
 
So you can buy it and transfer it off the 360? If not, it's not the same.

I have it on my pc through my zune software . Can I transfer bluray discs off the bluray player ?

Once somethings on my pc I can transfer it to almost anywhere in my house and use it on my tvs or my laptop.

Also I"m pretty sure that most blurays from disney come with a DD copy of the movie that is 1080p .
 
I mean why should I go to a store if online is cheaper and more convenient and faster?

And now you know why retail is dying, getting killed by a combination of online physical sales and digital sales. Within 5-10 years, you won't find retail stores selling media at all except for boutiques. Many of the box stores already know this and are trying various methods to shift to it.

Also, thanks for worrying about me, but I'm not concerned. If I'm unable to sell/trade games anymore, I simply will stop buying until they're <$20, and I'm definitely not in the minority as you can see from Steam users.

Which is fine with the publishers and developers, they'll make more money that way.

I can tell someone hasn't recovered from Blu-ray winning the HD media war and would give anything to not have blu-ray on the next non-sony console.

BR AND HD are already dead formats. DVD was/is the last great media format.
 
Kiosks are a horrible idea compared to just adding an optical drive which would not cost more than $20 by next gen. 3.5" Hard drives aren't designed to be portable and they fail far more often than 2.5" drives when they're moved around by the way.

3.5" HD are just as reliable as 2.5" hard drives. The failure modes are the same.

That's why you have installs, built in flash for caching in the console, etc. A 6x Blu-ray is 27MB/sec, already challenging the 2.5" drives, and no, there won't be 3.5" hard drives next gen, it'll stay 2.5" for power/space/portability/reliability reasons. 6X Blu-ray would be very quiet, and with caching to flash, games would run just fine. 6x is enough to keep it quiet and fast enough.

Modern 2.5" drives are in the 70-100 MB/s range. And god forbid if you are perfectly streaming on optical which means you'll be in the KB/s range where drives will still be in the 20-40 MB/s range. The only reason to use a 2.5" HD in a console is space reasons that realistically, its not that bid of a deal.

We've seen that the consumer cares about spending less with the wii, and DD with no resale will not be successful.

DD with no resale is ALREADY successful.

It's crazy to think DD-only games will be successful. The best strategy would be to have an optical drive as well as a disc drive, especially since the cost of the optical drive is not much.

Its an extra $20 to $30 per console of unneeded cost.
 
And now you know why retail is dying, getting killed by a combination of online physical sales and digital sales. Within 5-10 years, you won't find retail stores selling media at all except for boutiques. Many of the box stores already know this and are trying various methods to shift to it.
People like you said the same thing about music downloads in 2000, yet despite the biggest advantage of music downloads, which is the ability to only download and pay for a couple tracks instead of the whole album, and the file sizes being very small, the ability to carry thousands of songs with you, etc, CD's are still more than half of all music purchases, and that's in the US. Everywhere else DD is FAR less popular. It won't be relevant enough in the next 5 years to go discless. I guess you invested in HD DVD and lost the war just like eastmen and therefore hate blu-ray and Sony with a passion, eh?

3.5" HD are just as reliable as 2.5" hard drives. The failure modes are the same.
As long as they're not being moved around, yes. But notebook drives withstand G forces better, and they're better for portability. They can be powered solely by the USB port for starters.

Its an extra $20 to $30 per console of unneeded cost.
If by unneeded you mean throwing away more than half of your potential user base, yes it's unneeded.

DD with no resale is ALREADY successful.
Not for anything that cost more than $10-20 bucks.

BR AND HD are already dead formats. DVD was/is the last great media format
The world is a much bigger place than just the greater SF area, you know this right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PC gamers really don't care that much about resale ... they will buy DD if DD is cheaper (I don't buy new games for DD purely because it's more expensive than getting a box).
 
People like you said the same thing about music downloads in 2000, yet despite the biggest advantage of music downloads, which is the ability to only download and pay for a couple tracks instead of the whole album, and the file sizes being very small, the ability to carry thousands of songs with you, etc, CD's are still more than half of all music purchases, and that's in the US. Everywhere else DD is FAR less popular. It won't be relevant enough in the next 5 years to go discless. I guess you invested in HD DVD and lost the war just like eastmen and therefore hate blu-ray and Sony with a passion, eh?

So someone who isn't buying the fanboy line of massive Blu Ray success now hates Sony with a passion? Interesting projection.

I work in media distribution...DVD is still massively more popular than Blu Ray (which is odd, I'd have thought Blu Ray would be the majority by now, one title I very recently noted shipped about 7:1 in favor of DVD, not drastically different than for titles I checked a year+ ago), but not only that both are falling off a cliff in terms of sales as we speak.

Hell, I read an article in the paper a few weeks ago, which noted Disney was selling Miramax. As an aside, the article noted DVD sales have fallen to such an extent they are already throwing into doubt the value of studios back catalogs!

It's as I've noted for a long time and it's not arguable, Blu Ray is gaining a larger slice of a rapidly shrinking pie.

DD is far less popular everywhere else? LOL yeah right, try selling Blu Ray in China, Latin America, or the rest of the emerging world. I can promise it's even less popular than DD if it exists at all, in favor of digital piracy. You say half of music sales are still on CD, even if it is true it's meaningless, because CD sales themselves are a fraction of what they used to be. Download piracy is the other growth factor. And your assertion of vast disc sales elsewhere is also laughable because again, the emerging markets are buying less discs than anywhere, I doubt disc markets even exist for the most part in say, China (unless it's burned pirate discs). So no, it's actually much worse for disc sales everywhere else.
 
corduroygt said:
Everywhere else DD is FAR less popular
Depends how you define "DD". Online-only game market in Asia is not only bigger then entire PC Market in US/Europe (DD and retail combined), if current growth continues it will also be outpacing WorldWide console market(software) in a few years.
Of course, most of this revenue is not from DD game sales, but subscriptions or digital-item sales, but I'd say that still falls under DD.
 
3.5" HD are just as reliable as 2.5" hard drives.
Perhaps when stationary. However, the bigger mass of 3.5" hardware and the prevalence of contact start-stop head tech makes it more fragile when moved around (bearing damage, headslap etc.)

Modern 2.5" drives are in the 70-100 MB/s range.
7200 RPM units maybe reach 100MB/s. You'll "never" see those in consoles though. 4800 or 5400RPM drives are cheaper (and thus slower...)

And god forbid if you are perfectly streaming on optical which means you'll be in the KB/s range
If you're NOT perfectly streaming?

I remember Jak and Daxter on PS2 streamed quite well off of DVD back in 2004 or whatever... :) Criterion streams Paradise City with no hiccups off of BR at 60fps. Seems to work.

Its an extra $20 to $30 per console of unneeded cost.
It's not unneeded.

Most people don't want to wait a week while downloading one single 50GB game so they can play it.

Realistically, physical media CAN'T be done away with for at least another generation. Internet infrastructure - particulary the last bit out to customers - just isn't capable enough.
 
Of course, most of this revenue is not from DD game sales, but subscriptions or digital-item sales, but I'd say that still falls under DD.
I'd call that a service rather than DD products. The applications can be distributed via any means, and WOW got onto a lot of subscriber's computers via a boxed disc. Separating subscription service revenues from actual DD products that could be delivered on discs, what are Dd game sales really like?
 
A $100 feature is never $100 value overall when bundled with a system which does other things.
I think that depends on the buyer. for someone who doesbn't care for BRD, it adds no value. For someone who wants BRD playback, not ahving to buy a $100 standalone player makes it considerably worthwhile.
On average it has to be less than that because otherwise Sony would have completely blitzed Microsoft with their $400 then $300 then $200 etc value Blu Ray drive.
Value does not always usurp actual cost. Anyone trying to sell me a do-everything device for £1,000, replacing a hundred items at £100 each, won't get any sales despite the value, because if the pennies just won't stretch that far, no matter how much value there is you can't plain afford to buy.
 
It's not unneeded.
But it could be optional similarly to how HDD is optional for xbox.
you have fast internet? - grats, you just saved a few bucks!
you have slow internet? - too bad, stick with waiting a few hours for downloads or shell out a few bucks to get optical drive.

It's theoretically even possible to have the consoles use the disk drive attached to your PC and stream data over LAN, though if not done right it could make pirating games a bit too simple.
Most people don't want to wait a week while downloading one single 50GB game so they can play it.
Preloading and streaming in background works really great. WoW is an open-world MMO and latest cata beta is playable after downloading about 2GB out of nearly 20. Yea, it'll mean you will have a few pop-ups and potentially longer loading times when you teleport to other end of the world but it still works. Similarly as both Valve and Blizzard have shown preloading works great as well. You could have people download tens of GB's weeks before launch and have them activate the game the moment it's released, possibly by having them download the final patch of a few MBs. For me personally this would be far better than having to get a disc from a retail shop and possibly waiting for it to do an install to HDD to make loading faster anyway.

If it takes a week to download 50G game it means you use around 80kB/s 24/7. If you limit the download time to 24h you'll need around 4Mbit/s connection. If you can start playing after 2GB is downloaded and you have 4Mbit download you can start playing around 1h15min. It takes me longer to get to shop, buy the disc and get back home :)
Realistically, physical media CAN'T be done away with for at least another generation. Internet infrastructure - particulary the last bit out to customers - just isn't capable enough.
Yes, you can't go 100% DD but you could have it as main way of distribution with optional optical media.


I agree with what was said earlier: biggest problem with going to DD distribution model is that it will be much harder to sell the consoles on retail when retailers won't be getting a whole lot of software sales once people have bought the hardware.
 
So someone who isn't buying the fanboy line of massive Blu Ray success now hates Sony with a passion? Interesting projection.

I work in media distribution...DVD is still massively more popular than Blu Ray (which is odd, I'd have thought Blu Ray would be the majority by now, one title I very recently noted shipped about 7:1 in favor of DVD, not drastically different than for titles I checked a year+ ago), but not only that both are falling off a cliff in terms of sales as we speak.
http://hollywoodinhidef.com/2010/07/blu-ray-grows-112-through-june/
Blu-ray Disc sales were up 84% in the first half of the year and a whopping 112% in the second quarter, compared to the same periods last year, according to DEG: The Digital Entertainment Group.

DEGlogo150x150Despite another overall decline of 3.3% in consumer spending on home entertainment (DVD, Blu-ray Disc, digital distribution) to $8.8 billion in the first six months, sales and rentals of Blu-ray Disc reached a combined total of $982 million for the first half of the year, with Blu-ray Disc sales accounting for $733 million in the period, and $363 million in the second quarter alone.
I'm not a Blu-ray fanboy or anything, but it's a successful format and still growing. It's the preferred choice for owning movies, while I see DD's advantages for renting them.


DD is far less popular everywhere else? LOL yeah right, try selling Blu Ray in China, Latin America, or the rest of the emerging world. I can promise it's even less popular than DD if it exists at all, in favor of digital piracy.
Wait...so you include piracy with DD? Then of course it's the most popular distribution method in the world since it has no DRM and it's free :) As far as revenue generation, paid DD has no chance of exceeding Blu-ray, which is slowly replacing dvd, because good luck trying to make the pirates pay for the same thing they're getting for free. At least with a disc, the cost is justified with the better quality and owning a physical product, so even the pirates sometimes would buy them.

You say half of music sales are still on CD
Unlike some people I reply to here (not you), I don't post without having proof:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/cd-sale-free-fall-continued-in-2009/
Digital downloads now account for 40% of music purchases.
10+ years on the market plus the incredible price advantage of downloading individual songs vs. CD's, and none of the technical issues that come with huge file sizes and it's still at 40%, and that's US only. I can guarantee everywhere else, far less songs are sold through itunes or amazon in favor of piracy.

Paid DD in those markets is non-existent, because there's the free alternative. If you look at revenue generation, Blu-ray discs have a better chance than DD since they differentiate themselves from pirated material by owning a tangible product that's also higher quality.
 
I disagree with optical being needed.

I'm still trying to catch up with this long thread, but I honestly don't see how anyone can disagree with optical being needed. If you want to reach the broadest audience possible, then yes optical is needed.

On top of the reduced possible audience, you also have old school stubborn gamers like me who prefer to have a physical disc that I can claim full ownership over instead of a digital download that would probably be infected with DRM and still controlled to an extent by the publisher.:devilish:

I don't see next gen dropping optical media, the gen following that though, it's quite a possibility.
 
I think that depends on the buyer. for someone who doesbn't care for BRD, it adds no value. For someone who wants BRD playback, not ahving to buy a $100 standalone player makes it considerably worthwhile.

Its more complicated than that. Its also about eggs in baskets (fear of loss), less utility given theres no remote and you can't use say movie playback and gaming at the same time whereas with two devices you can and the general acceptance of the idea of using a console as a media centre.

Value does not always usurp actual cost. Anyone trying to sell me a do-everything device for £1,000, replacing a hundred items at £100 each, won't get any sales despite the value, because if the pennies just won't stretch that far, no matter how much value there is you can't plain afford to buy.

It works for a car manufacturer. You get a status symbol, reproduction location, sound stage and transportation in the one device. Anyway, funny talk aside most people who play games nowadays are 18+ and if they cannot afford a console then they probably can't afford the games. This generation has proved pretty conclusively that people will pay for an experience they value.

Oh and how about something funny:

How does it sound to have multiple different X86 cores on the same die? I.E. Have one Bulldozer module in order to kick amdahl's law in the pants for code which simply will not parallelize and bobcat for low power / relatively small cores for code which does. Bobcat is meant to be 90% Athlon X2 performance on 50% of the area with a very low TDP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top