Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all the excitement over the confirmed GPU clock(IMHO only interesting to dispel rumors of downclock) I guess the bit on the podcast about no Xbox Guide got overlooked. That's cool.
Tommy McClain
You want to be that guy? Really?
53Mhz and now it is a completely different console?
This is where eastmen and my other source for the upclock rumour differ.
Eastmen thinks there'll be a CPU upclock as well, while my other source only has heard a GPU upclock being considered, however he doesn't have confirmation that they're not going to upclock the CPU - he just hasn't heard a CPU upclock being mentioned.
You miss understand. There is only a gpu upclock from my understanding.
Also its my understanding that the yield problems are very true.
Where's that info from? I can't find the Jaguar power consumption anywhere in isolation from the CUs of the AMD APUs.8 Jaguar cores at 1.6 GHz probably consumes ~20W
Where's that info from? I can't find the Jaguar power consumption anywhere in isolation from the CUs of the AMD APUs.
"Under 20W" would be more accurate. Anandtech found that the entire A4-5000 platform (4C/1.5 GHz) didn't use more than 11.5W when loading the CPU:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6981/...ality-of-mainstream-pcs-with-its-latest-apu/2
Also, the TDP of the Jaguar-based CPU-only Opteron X1150 (4C/2.0 GHz) is listed as 17W. Power consumption of the cores would likely be lower than that.
That's 4 cores not 8. Double those numbers and you get 23W and 34W respectively. The reason not to announce any changes sooner is to prevent a response from Sony.
I also suspect the 15W TDP is perhaps a bit conservative, total platform power consumption with all CPU cores firing never exceeded 12W (meaning SoC power consumption is far lower, likely sub-10W).
So you are saying it has always been 1.8?
If your source is a developer I'd assume his information is hearsay as I suspect very few people inside Microsoft, let alone outside, will know yield numbers. It's not relevant to developers so they won't be told numbers.Also its my understanding that the yield problems are very true.
If your source is a developer I'd assume his information is hearsay as I suspect very few people inside Microsoft, let alone outside, will know yield numbers. It's not relevant to developers so they won't be told numbers.
Hopefully ms talks about the cpu soon amd ram so everything can get put to rest.
But MS already talked about RAM.
But MS already talked about RAM.
8Gb it's the System Memory as indicated here.
that would be completely against every product description ever mode though, no? Every product description like this says total RAM, excluding what's available for software/services. You don't buy a Samsung phone to have it listed as 1GB when in fact there's 2 GBs but 1 GB is taken up with the OS. If there isn't 8 Gbs total RAM inside the XB1, it means a change since that slide was made, and not that the slide was only showing what's available for games.I don't want to enter in a non-end debate, but is this the total ram quantity in the system? they can keep saying "it is 8GB system memory" and now add "all available to devs".
If the 12GB thing is real, the image can be accurate.