Ahm...so whoever likes MGS4;s visuals is a ******...Whats next? GOW looks like crap?
Motorstorm screens
- Thread starter Angelcurio
- Start date
GOW is definatly looking worse, I mentioned that in the most recent shots post here.
But seriously, it seems that maturity escapes you. Back up your posts with actual relevant information and try to type slower.
In the Heavenly Sword thread I pointed out your argument 'prove why this game is good looking' isn't a fair question. As this is a Mtoorstorm thread, there shouldn't be any such discussion about MGS regardless.
If you want to talk the technical and artistic merits of MGS, start a new thread or grab one of the existing ones with screenshots and point out what's right with it. But as in you HS posts you seemed to think every game looks bad, and certainly no game is without the faults you have identified, it seems to me what you are after isn't technically possible, and it'll be a few hardware generations before anyone can please you. You're loss.
If you want to talk the technical and artistic merits of MGS, start a new thread or grab one of the existing ones with screenshots and point out what's right with it. But as in you HS posts you seemed to think every game looks bad, and certainly no game is without the faults you have identified, it seems to me what you are after isn't technically possible, and it'll be a few hardware generations before anyone can please you. You're loss.
And so the donkey called the rooster a "bighead".
Thats why you are talking about MGS in a motorstorm thread?
Oh I suggest you do the same
Um, you obviously, for pointing out a typo in response to a polite request to stay on topic and to consider how you go about analysing what's good or bad in an image. If you weren't being petty, I expect you'd have done something like written 'yeah, sorry for the off topic. I'll continue this in the MGS thread' and then pointed out the things you dislike about MGS, at which point I'd point at the many faults in Saint's Row and Dead Rising and asked why you rate them highly, and we'd have had a nice little discussion.
There is if you remain polite. I know some people were giving you grief, but I was quite happy to talk sensibly if you were.
DeathKnight
Regular
The high-res screens are why the low-res screens are made 
Prey?
I don't spell check, either. Spellcheck is against my personal beliefs. If you'd like to discuss it in private I'd be happy to let you know more about it.
However if you want to judge me for it I'll not pray to the whatever god may or may not exist to let haphazard consequence make your life a living hell!
I don't care about your subjective opinion, thats all your own. But asserting that anyone who thinks the game is impressive is simply a blind f@nboy that can't "see the truth" is absolutely pretentious nonsense. Pretentious bullshit in fact.
sorry for going OT, I'll drop it from here.
I know you're a unbiased gamer. But you've stated Resistence is in the same level as Crysis and now this... I need some of what ever you've got over there.
no not at all really... i just think Resistance is of high enough quality at its current stage to make the render footage of games like Killzone and the actual footage of games like Crysis reasonable within this generation on both systems. I dont think that that is a bad or warrantless opinion based on the videos we have seen to date.... one of the elements that I particularly like about Resistance (even though I generally hate the art) is the persistence of effects like smoke and fire... in games like CoD and GoW on x360 effects dissipate rather quickly as if the alphablending involved is really taxing the system... plus the lack of angles (read polygon edges) on several Ps3 games I'm seeing is very attractive to me becasue it doesnt make me feel like its a computer game....
my holy grail for videogaming has always been lighting, water and caustics/particle effects... lighting still isnt there, water is there now, and caustics/particle effects are coming along... if Heavenly Sword gets their atmospherics right so that the atmosphere plays with the lighting to make the game environment seem REAL in the outdoor stages, I will be sold on PS3 myself. My hope is that x360 game designers (personally THE BEST LOOKING GAME in the next generation for me so far is MASS EFFECT even above MGS) will step it up sometime soon...
To be more on topic the caustics/particle effects seen in these motorstorm shots, the lack of polygon edges in this and Resistance vidoes (except for the wood) and the persistence of particle effects in Resistance are very encouraging signs that next gen developers are getting a dial into the hardware and the reults are very impressive. Just telling it how i see it.. killzone's render and crysis are within reach...
Last edited by a moderator:
They're still worlds apart.
Resistance
Killzone
The style and quality of the assets may be a matter of personal taste; but on the technical side Resistance has wahsed out textures on flat surfaces, single inaccurate shadows, flat lighting, very simple atmospherics and smokes, and I can in fact see a lot of poly edges there. And it's an uber-AA devkit shot, ingame it'll be worse in its quality.
It's not a bad looking game at all, but don't fool yourself, and absolutely don't expect us to get fooled by you...
I really dont know what that attitude is all about...
but whatever man... all the mumbo jumbo technical blah blah means nothing... resistance and motorsorm represent a VECTOR (direction, speed) that next generation graphics seem to be going. I NEVER SAID THEY LOOK AS GOOD AS THE RENDERS. I said that what we see represented on screen is an indicator that the renders are and ingame of games like crysis are definitely within reach of the next gen consoles... or in any case they will look good enough to be a reasonable, non-disappointing facsimiles of what was rendered. GR:AW was my first indication... now these games further confirm what is possible... in both cases they are only first generation games at best (launch games may not even be rightly called first gen). If this level of fidelity is being achieved now, then by gen 3 I think we should basically be near render quality.
Geesh calm down graphics man!
DuckThor Evil
Legend
blackjedi said:
Not that I really care, but one could easily misunderstand that you did say that it looks better than the renderer...
"personally" i like these screens better... the whys and wherefores of which i explained in several posts...
A case of seeing what you want to see, believing what you want to believe?
ps. In motion or not, Motorstorm would benefit a deal with a bump in textures resolution and smoothing out the polygon edges. Frankly both are below my minimum "standard" for next gen. I am not holding out on the dust and mud particles to match the renders, nor the flames and smoke.
ps. In motion or not, Motorstorm would benefit a deal with a bump in textures resolution and smoothing out the polygon edges. Frankly both are below my minimum "standard" for next gen. I am not holding out on the dust and mud particles to match the renders, nor the flames and smoke.
Similar threads
- Locked
