Laa-Yosh said:Just what I've expected... let's stop this discussion now.
mckmas8808 said:YEAH I think it's close. 90% at least.
scooby_dooby said:Wow, I'm losing alot of respect for you right now. Is it really so hard to be objective? Close? You have to be blind to think these are 'close' they look nothing alike.
scooby_dooby said:Wow, I'm losing alot of respect for you right now. Is it really so hard to be objective? Close? You have to be blind to think these are 'close' they look nothing alike.
Acert93 said:Well, "nothing" is quite strong. But objectively this falls short of the CGI render target in many ways. The gameplay looks very interesting and there is some good stuff here, but not the gulf in quality we were told to expect. And there is a lot to knit pick here compared to other next gen games, let along the CGI. It also has some great things going on (mud!). Definately NOT the mind blowing experience the render target set as a "bar". But I do look forward to some video AND play testing!
I don't think it will be playable.mckmas8808 said:Is this game playable at E3?
scooby_dooby said:Wow, I'm losing alot of respect for you right now. Is it really so hard to be objective? Close? You have to be blind to think these are 'close' they look nothing alike.
scooby_dooby said:Wow, I'm losing alot of respect for you right now. Is it really so hard to be objective? Close? You have to be blind to think these are 'close' they look nothing alike.
dantruon said:honestly i thought the this year e3 pic look better than last year one and that is my opinion and nothing you could do to change it. If you do you will loose respect.