the fungus only infect body, not soul or spirit. with a bit of screaming and flashback it's controllable.
I think I remember wrong game
I think I remember wrong game
Actually there is a family, Romanian I think, that all share a mutation that makes them super strong with a skeletal structure that is much denser than normal. They are as close as we have to super humans, physiologically that is.
I remember reading about the youngest son who at the age of ten or so was power lifting some absurdly huge weights.
This topic has lasted more than I thought it would, and I thought I made myself clear by this point. So I'll repeat the most important part, all games have stupidish stories, LoU is not worse, its actually probably gonna be better, but to me personally the zombies are the less clever part.
Now my next points are going to be about me trying to clarify to Prophecy why I think the fungus of LoU is little plausible, and why I think those implausibilities are exaclty the kind of convenient disconnections with reality present in cheap fiction.
In the very first trailer of LoU, we see zombies running into a room - not idiotically, but pretty intelligently - they stop as they notice the dead bodies ( human enemies Joel just killed ) they either felt their smell, or saw them, or both. Two get off camera, suposedly to eat the flesh of the bodies, one of them is seen getting on his knees right next to body and bending over it, as the camera cuts it off we hear sounds of them eating their flesh. One of them then comes to Joel, he tries to lunge over him, but he holds it by its arms, and the creature does fight against him, it looks like it is attempting to bite him. So the only thing I really guessed is that they are totally unconscious - they could after all still have conscience, past memories and ego, though I am willing to bet whatever you want this is not going to be the case in the game ( ok, not really, just trying to be hyperbolic haha. Actually I hope I'm wrong about that one as that would make the game far more interesting )
Now, I know it is biologically possible for a fungus to cause those symptoms, but it is statistically less likelly than the same person betting on the right numbers on the federal lotery 5 times in a row just by luck (also a possible scenario, just very unlikely)
Why? Because humans are not as simple as you seem to think they are. Can a bunch of hormones affect the behaviour of a person? COMPLETELY, now to affect to affect them in a way as specific as they are in this game, you need a pretty complex combination of what hormones, what areas of the brain to attack, in what order, when, how, and so many other factors. As I said, its ok for a disease to cause random hallucinations, anxiety, violent behaviour, stress etc. Now to generate specific patterns like "develop a special taste human flesh, don't forget how to run, keep your balance, move about, scout for humans and fight against them if necessary, oh and do that in groups, but for everything else be completely unconscious" That is not some trivial behaviour you can obtain by one or two chemicals in a person's brain, that is a convenient Game/movie/comic-book making plot device, but not a likely outcome of a couple mutations of a fungus that at its current form does nothing more then grow its spores inside an ant and trigger some funny reaction on it to make it go up. There is no "make me into a zombie" switch you can just turn-on on a human head, that would take hundreds of very specific, organized, and well administered interventions to the brain. I think you can agree with me on that.
With a behaviour as complex as a fungus would need to develop to create such a complex mind controlling capability over humans, we are not really talking about such a simple micro-organism anymore. That is why Rabies is a good example. It makes peaple agressive, but pretty stupidly so, on a way that is very to what LoU is depicting.
My point about humanity having time to develop a cure was not really a focus, and this is a pretty dificult topic to analyse. What I was saying, was that its not very easy for a disease to completely obliterate civilization to the point that the game is depicting. We've had some pretty fucked up epidemics hit europe during the dark ages, where medicine and society itself were much more rudimentary, and it didn't have as drastic results as what we see in LoU. It left europe with a third of its population, but by the looks of whole big cities completely empty of the trailers, the american populations has been reduced much more than that in the game. Still, this is not the most improbable plot point. It could be made into something justifiable with insightfull writing, but it is not that easy.
And by the way, if their explanation is that it comes from military experiments ( which I also have a feeling that is not the case ) that would be pretty unlikely too. Our ability to conjure up micro-organisms with specific tasks, while pretty advanced compared to decades ago, is not capable enough of creating this kind of thing either. Some might say, but they came from a super secret underground facility which kept most of its discoveries secret... Do I need to say why that hypothesis is unrealistic too?
Of course many elements of LoU's fiction kind of make sense and kind of could happen, thats what writers do. The find convincing explanations to things, but they take pretty big poetic liberties.
And finally, to clarify the X-Men part. I just used X-Men to give an example of another work of fiction that takes real scientific phenomena and exaggerates them to create a fantastic loosely plausible universe. What I was trying to say was: there are mutants in the real world just like in the X-Men, that doesn't mean its very likely we will ever see a real life Wolverine anytime soon. In the same note, there are diseases that can affect the mind, and fungus that make little ants behave a little weird, but a fungus that turns humans into strategically ( from the point of view of making interesting gameplay ) intelligent killing machines is a stretch. I hope we can agree with my reasoning. Which certainly is nitpicky for a game's plot, but I'm doing it for fun, and I think all thise has very little influence on the actual quality of the game.
PS: I hope we the threat can move on to other subjects related to the game without us delving much more into this whole thing I kind of helped create.
MK UltraThere are hundreds of different chemical compounds that have psychotrophic and behavior modifying effects that exist. Almost all are found in nature and created naturally by organisms to serve a specific purpose. There's abosolutely no reason why if a fungus that can create chemical signals to affect and manipulate the minds of ants, another can't do a similar thing creating chemicals to alter the state of a human mind. Hypnotists don't have a problem making people do whatever they desire for them to do, how much more an organism that can affect even the basic chemistry of the human brain. It's not hard...
Had we humans the complete understanding of every chemical process and compound at work in a human mind, there's absolutely no question that it would be possible and actually pretty easy for us to control people's brains, provided you have the means to synthesise the right chemicals. Nature through, DNA transcription and protein synthesis has always been much better than us at synthesising super complex chemicals. And organisms that can do so out of necessity (i.e. survival) rather than a desire to profit, are far far more adept at such than we could ever be on our own.
MK Ultra
The CIA has been experimenting with these technologies and has been using them since probably the 60's, 70's
Scary and sad but true
Did this thread get infected by some fungus too?!?!?!?
Did this thread get infected by some fungus too?!?!?!?
Your entire basis for defining the likeliness or plausability of TLOU's plot is based on your assumptions about the level of consciousness, intelligence and lucidity of the games' infected.
Denser bones does not a stronger person make... Ask any anatomy expert. It is in fact a myth. In fact denser bones would be a very bad thing, as bones themselves are porous structures allowing the diffusion of blood cells made in the marrow to flow into the blood stream, replenishing dead ones. Denser bones would make this process more difficult and such a person would end up with severe health problems. There are a few weird diseases and conditions that cause an increase in bone density, none of them make people stronger ;-)
Also, if that romanian family are stronger than the average bear, then it probably has more to do with their genes causing them to produce higher levels of testosterone, HGH or other such hormones which increase muscle mass and strength. Still however if from the age of ten they are power-lifting, I think that's a much more likely explanation to why they're stronger than the average person than anything else.
Mutation doesn't give people superhuman abilities overnight. Nobody is born with a physique like Arnie Swartznegger, and is able to lift 2 tonne weights with their fingertips. Being able to bench press above your BMI isn't superhuman, being able to push a tank over with a flick of the wrist is.
There is that gross disease that means your bones never stop growing,some of the skeletons I have seen with that are pretty amazing. If a little bit Geiger...
But this is a specific, documented mutation that has been passed down through the mRNA line. But only affects the males in the family. They are born preternaturally strong. The dense bone structure allows them to support greater weights than a normal skeleton would.
But you are right in that pushing a tank over with a flick of the wrist may never happen. Mainly because at that point physics would take over and you'd probably end up sunk into the ground up to your waist before the tank moved...
New shots, look amazing.
http://images.gamersyde.com/image_the_last_of_us-21138-2408_0002.jpg
http://images.gamersyde.com/image_the_last_of_us-21138-2408_0003.jpg
http://images.gamersyde.com/image_the_last_of_us-21141-2408_0001.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8059/8261726837_60287c5da3_o.png
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8215/8262794740_10f099d95c_o.png
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8360/8261726125_83ea2699bd_o.png
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8079/8262793956_a41b8957ab_o.png
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8339/8262795666_885c1e5d91_o.png
mRNA stands for "messenger-ribonucleic-acid". I may be wrong, but I don't think mRNA is passed down generation lines at all. mRNA is used during protein synthesis by ribosomes I believe. The only genetic material passed from parent to children exists in the Chromasomes as DNA, and also through mitochondrial DNA in the mitochondria that live within the two gamete cells. mRNA is synthesised in the body from DNA by transcription, I believe.
At the same time however, I now feel compelled to look at some pics of said freaky never-ending-bone-growth-people. :-O
Is this suposed to be funny?