Intel ARC GPUs, Xe Architecture for dGPUs [2022-]

Which doesn't mean it's not simply the video block motion estimation with a little compute pre/post-processing, which it almost certainly is. Tegra had those too.
 

DF seems have better RT results that HUB - aside from Miles Morales.

One thing that caught my attention in the HUB review is that they actually left Physx ON for Metro Exodus, which should be killing performance on anything but Nvidia. DF used maxxed out RT and just disabled Physx:

1734021447734.png

What's more concerning is the frame time blips in several games (F1, Cyberpunk, Alan Wake, Spiderman). Those are deal breakers for me, hopefully they can be sorted. It further reinforces why reviews that only focus on average/1% lows are so inadequate, HUB didn't catch those stutters because they're not measuring it. Periodic brief stutters, even for a <1 min benchmark run, will not necessarily be detectable by 1% lows.

Even at 1080p, you can see some games hitting that 8GB vram wall:

1734021915551.png
 
Last edited:
My (previously mentioned) wait is over. Got more or less exact confirmation for that.

However as 3070Ti owner who has about 3 hours in a week to play satisfactory...
Everything in BMG-G21 looks good... ...for BMG-G31. Which was seen as non-R&D form in shipping manifests on 3rd of December. I am not expecting it to be released before the two giants have shown how next gen is truly defined.
After that, It's viability as end user product against competition and it's possible pricing window will define if it is released and if yes, it's classification.
 
Performance under Linux
obr-zek-2024-12-18-100502428.png

Michael Larabel said:
When taking the geometric mean of all the game tests that ran successfully on all of the graphics cards, the Intel Arc B580 on Linux came out to delivering 1.66x the performance of the prior generation Arc A580 graphics card. Or compared to the prior Arc A770 flagship, the Arc B580 was at 1.45x the performance. Overall though both the GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 7600 graphics cards were faster than the current Arc B580. It will be interesting to see though what more Battlemage/Xe2 graphics driver optimizations come to the open-source Linux drivers in the coming weeks.


obr-zek-2024-12-18-095653794.png


Michael Larabel said:
The Linux performance for the Alchemist-based Arc A580 and A770 were faster on Linux than Windows in part due to all of the OpenGL benchmarks and such, but for the new Arc B580 the better performance is on Windows 11 with Intel's latest Windows driver. It's nice that there is upstream open-source Intel graphics driver support for Battlemage on launch day, but there is still more room for better optimizing the Intel Xe2/Battlemage Linux graphics driver support. It should be interesting to re-visit this in the weeks/months ahead to see if the Intel open-source software engineers are able to close the gap for Battlemage.

 
Last edited:
Seems Intel memory management is still sub par, they still rely on Re-BAR to handle, as without it performance massively drops, this excludes Intel as a viable upgrade path for older systems.
 
I will have the a770 for awhile but it will be interesting to see if they release another faster version this generation. What would be great fun is if was like the old days where you could try unlocking cores and it was unknown whether you were getting an awesome deal or just a fine deal. If I'm honest though I think those days are gone and you would not attract many enthusiasts anyway.
 
Seems Intel memory management is still sub par, they still rely on Re-BAR to handle, as without it performance massively drops, this excludes Intel as a viable upgrade path for older systems.
Based on latest tests by hardware unboxed, performance drops in older systems even if the rebar is enabled. Common determinator seems to be cpu heavy game, so the drivers are not as optimized (or are optimized to newer cpus) as nVidia or AMD.

Which sort of makes sense. As new player in market, the resources will be easily shifted towards future, not past. Competition has lived thru the past times, so they have thw knowledge already for older cpus.

Too bad for the People with more than 3 years old hw though.
 

DF seems have better RT results that HUB - aside from Miles Morales.

One thing that caught my attention in the HUB review is that they actually left Physx ON for Metro Exodus, which should be killing performance on anything but Nvidia. DF used maxxed out RT and just disabled Physx:

View attachment 12620

What's more concerning is the frame time blips in several games (F1, Cyberpunk, Alan Wake, Spiderman). Those are deal breakers for me, hopefully they can be sorted. It further reinforces why reviews that only focus on average/1% lows are so inadequate, HUB didn't catch those stutters because they're not measuring it. Periodic brief stutters, even for a <1 min benchmark run, will not necessarily be detectable by 1% lows.

Even at 1080p, you can see some games hitting that 8GB vram wall:

View attachment 12621
As someone that recently finished HB2 on a 3070. Yes, that 8GB wall is hit hard from time to time. At times the game can also be a little buggy and lose VRAM somewhere in there like some sort of memory leak.
 
I will have the a770 for awhile but it will be interesting to see if they release another faster version this generation. What would be great fun is if was like the old days where you could try unlocking cores and it was unknown whether you were getting an awesome deal or just a fine deal. If I'm honest though I think those days are gone and you would not attract many enthusiasts anyway.
I see possible bmg-g31 my only option from 3070ti. AMD RT performance is step backwards and 50 series prices will most likely out of my budget.


So hoping the best.
 
I see possible bmg-g31 my only option from 3070ti. AMD RT performance is step backwards and 50 series prices will most likely out of my budget.


So hoping the best.
3070ti is on 4060ti level which means that it will probably be 5060 level in half a year, and anything above that will be an option for an upgrade. Which means $400+ probably which is also where a faster BMG will likely be - give or take a hundred.

Intel isn't doing anything magical, they simply launched a month before cards which they will actually compete with.
 
Yeah, well I have owned two 8GB cards which makes up last 6 years and my primary display is 2560x1440, so I am not going to buy another one. theoritically 5060ti or 5070 could be possible though 12gb was the memory I was looking for in 2-3 years ago but just could not tolerate the prices. 5070ti checks that but it Will most likely wayy over my budget.

Besides, I am not expecting miracle from Intel. I would be happy with competitive (in same price range) card with 16GB memory in 500-700 euros price class. (G21 cards cost around 350 euros here. AIB cards that is. Limited Edition Landed here in twin digit quantities.)
 
Back
Top