Image Quality and Framebuffer Analysis for Available/release build Games *Read the first post*

[Kasersky]

Nearly identical. See: http://www.lensoftruth.com/heads-up-resident-evil-operation-raccoon-city-analysis/

But ~27% Tearing on the PS3, wth?

well this is what i was implying, because the 360 sub resolution it would most likely have better performance.

i think using averages misrepresent performance. it depends on the scene the length of the sample etc. if you have one section with horrible frame drops but the sample length was 5 minutes the averages will be close to 30fps regardless.

between the two the ps3 doesnt perform well at all.

 

[Kasersky]

Any word on Jak & Dexter "sub HD" Collection? This games are really confusing, some edges looks too clean to be sHD but many others aren't 720p for sure. But I'm no expert.

http://media1.gameinformer.com/imagefeed/screenshots/JakandDaxterCollection/012.jpg

1120x720 looks like its being scaled horizontally

 

[Ruskie]

Witcher 2.

http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/75/witcher2_387561b.jpg
http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/75/witcher2_387571b.jpg
http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/75/witcher2_387591b.jpg

 

[Arnold Beckenbauer]

Don't kill me:
Max Payne Mobile for iOS.

iPhone 4:

The new iPad:
http://www.forum-3dcenter.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=9247936&postcount=187

Ist it upscaled or not? Payne's UI seems to be native.

 

[Nesh]

for Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City

looks like ps3 is 1280x720, 360 sub 720.

look at the hunk closeup shot the pixel edges on the ps3 version look 1:1. 360 version looks like its being upscaled.

considering the resolution comprise wonder how the framerate compares between the two.

Nearly identical. See: http://www.lensoftruth.com/heads-up-resident-evil-operation-raccoon-city-analysis/

But ~27% Tearing on the PS3, wth?

Heh, I love it how inaccurate LOT can be. States the resolutions that the 360 goes up to 1080p and the PS3 up to 720p. They dont even do proper pixel counting. They go by what is stated on the box or what the info on the TV says.

 

[ultragpu]

So the Witcher 2 is sub HD then, did Richard forget to check the res in his tech analysis?
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/122/75455870.jpg

 

[N2O]

1194x672 or 1280x672?

 

[warb]

It's looking pretty great at that. What are they doing for AA?

 

[assurdum]

1194x672 or 1280x672?

Curious to know me too

 

[kagemaru]

It's looking pretty great at that. What are they doing for AA?

FXAA most likely.

Curious to know me too

Don't own a 360, and won't get the game, but you're curious how far below HD resolutions the game is?

Interesting...

 

[Kasersky]

http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/75/witcher2_387571b.jpg

horizontal resolution looks like 1280 check fence post on bottom right (31 pixels of confirmation)

1280x672 liekly.

 

[assurdum]

FXAA most likely.



Don't own a 360, and won't get the game, but you're curious how far below HD resolutions the game is?

Interesting...

What? I have a 360 from 2006's christmas however I'm pretty curious to know more because I'm always interested in every aspect of a game tech.... although multi now I prefer to play on my pc...

 

[assurdum]

well this is what i was implying, because the 360 sub resolution it would most likely have better performance.

i think using averages misrepresent performance. it depends on the scene the length of the sample etc. if you have one section with horrible frame drops but the sample length was 5 minutes the averages will be close to 30fps regardless.

between the two the ps3 doesnt perform well at all.

I think the real reason because it's sub hd it's the engine's origin...isn't it the same used in Socom franchise (native on ps3 hardware)?

 

[kagemaru]

What? I have a 360 from 2006's christmas however I'm pretty curious to know more because I'm always interested in every aspect of a game tech.... although multi now I prefer to play on my pc...

Oh my mistake, I never really see you commenting much in 360 exclusive threads, so I just assumed. Sorry about that

Not surprised you moved on to pcs though considering how long this generation has stretched out.

 

[AlNom]

Ist it upscaled or not? Payne's UI seems to be native.

Yeah. I believe it's a 27/32 ratio in both dimensions meaning 810x540.

 

[helio]

I think the witcher 2 360 is in 720p.
http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/697/thewitcher2pcpixel2.jpg
http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/3632/thewitcher2360pixel2.jpg
On another board:
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/4786/thewitcher2360pixel4.jpg
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/2057/thewitcher2pcpixel4.jpg
Original segment:
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/354/thewitcher2pixelpc360.jpg

 

[assurdum]

I think the witcher 2 360 is in 720p.
http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/697/thewitcher2pcpixel2.jpg
http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/3632/thewitcher2360pixel2.jpg
On another board:
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/4786/thewitcher2360pixel4.jpg
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/2057/thewitcher2pcpixel4.jpg
Original segment:
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/354/thewitcher2pixelpc360.jpg

Forgive me but to me seem really evident the opposite & not need pixel counter here: have you notice the difference in the widescreen ratio in your pictures? the characters in the 360 version appears clearly stretched....to be honest the whole picture is more stretched...

 

[AlNom]

It's 672.

 

[Rangers]

So I guess this is Nova 3 running on iPAD 3, direct capture?

http://i.minus.com/djH4tNE0ctwDl.jpg

Actually running at native iPad3 res?

 

[AlNom]

Looks like it.