I think it's a bit different if a team (or driver) sacrifices his own position in order to receive a 5-place grid penalty and lives with the trade-off of starting from the other side of the grid, but 5 positions further back - compared to a team, using one of their drivers to artificially alter the grid (at the very last minute) in order to give their other driver an advantage.
It would become even more disturbing if it not only alters other drivers, but drivers that are directly competing for the WDC - i.e. if Massa had qualified in front of Vettel and his penalty would be artificially taken for the sole purpose of changing Vettels position.
Obviously, this is something you can not change - unless, the grid penalties alter to an even number - but apart from that, there's no way to police it. Perhaps it would have been better (for the sport) if Ferrari had kept quiet and acted as if they had a genuine fault on the car, rather than officially announce their plan to alter the grid artificially. I also have less trouble with the team using team-orders while the race is on-going to change the order of its drivers. With tactics such as these, I just wonder - how far are they willing to go and where do you draw the line between what is tolerable and what not?
It would become even more disturbing if it not only alters other drivers, but drivers that are directly competing for the WDC - i.e. if Massa had qualified in front of Vettel and his penalty would be artificially taken for the sole purpose of changing Vettels position.
Obviously, this is something you can not change - unless, the grid penalties alter to an even number - but apart from that, there's no way to police it. Perhaps it would have been better (for the sport) if Ferrari had kept quiet and acted as if they had a genuine fault on the car, rather than officially announce their plan to alter the grid artificially. I also have less trouble with the team using team-orders while the race is on-going to change the order of its drivers. With tactics such as these, I just wonder - how far are they willing to go and where do you draw the line between what is tolerable and what not?