Except a Renault which Fernando Alonso managed to win both championships twice in. But I forget you hate Fernando so I guess it doesn't really count.Yeah, also glad for him. He's not a bad driver, he just never had a really competitive car.
He should have won more races.Fisichella was 4th and 5th in championship those seasons, that's not bad at all. Is Massa bad too because he was 4th when Kimi won the championship?
Sure, but xxx said he never had a competitive car which is rubbish.There's a difference being one of the best 3-5 drivers, and being a good driver you know?
Sure, but xxx said he never had a competitive car which is rubbish.
Except a Renault which Fernando Alonso managed to win both championships twice in.
Exactly, we know exactly what the deal was at Renault because of Alonsos actions when he didn't get the same treatment at another team and this years Piquet "scandal".He was a clear No.2 in that team, doesn't count for me.
Key words are "Fisi, 1 win" and "Alonso, no wins" and "Fisi demanded #1" and "Fisi couldn't hack it".Key words there are he, wanted, to and be, not he was.
Defense rests your honour.
Still does not detract from the fact that the R25 and R26 were competitive cars.Bludd, shell we also mention who has the biggest sponsors? Important thing in F1.
Other damning evidence for you to pointlessly try and defend.Key words are "Fisi, 1 win" and "Alonso, no wins" and "Fisi demanded #1" and "Fisi couldn't hack it".
It's not about wins for Ferrari anymore, its all about the constructors championship and the buttload of cash you get the higher up you finish.
.