london-boy said:
Your post was ok up until that part... What on earth would Nintendo care about what movie people would play on their GC if it had DVD features??? So, parents would actually go out and sue Nintendo cause their son played porn DVD on his GC?
I've never heard of parents suing Sony or MS or Panasonic or Philips or JVC or any other company becasue "their son was watching porn on their DVD players"...
Remember, there IS a GC with DVD capabilities. It never made it out of Japan, sadly.
I know, I almost purchased the console as I held it in my hands at a local import shop, however that is not the point because that is just an optional console, not a standard medium.
One example I could give is that having a standard DVD sized media would have allowed devs to have a game with lots of FMV scenes for alternate endings and dramatic events, something devs only had a choice with PS2 and XBox.
Are you asking me in MS could do that? How would i know? If Sony could do it less than 10 years ago, many others could, with the right attitude and vision. MS obviously entered this market witht he wrong attitude, as we have all seen.
Agreed, as much as I like XBox, MS had no clue and I am almost thinking that the gamers they hired or used as focus groups were all raised on Atari 2600s.
True. And today's not all that different. Remember, we're talking about the casual gamers who do not know what a pixel shader is.
Right.
PDO is exclusive, and Xbox has a few arcade exclusives. Obviously having more games, from Sega too, would have "helped". The point was, would it be enough for the Xbox to actually make its mark and take a significant share of the market from Sony? That's arguable, out of all the latest Sega titles, i can only see very few that would have "sold systems". They might be good games, but not system sellers. Especially the latest Sonic titles, very underwhelming, but then again, the Sonic franchise hasn't been great since the Genesis days.
I personally never like multi console ports and I feel that is why the last Sonic title was very underwhelming but then again I feel that the Sonic franchise hasn't been as great since the Dreamcast days in the sense that those two games made were at least faithfull to the classic games just like Mario 64 was for previous Mario games.
That and since DC could never get momentum with the impending Sony PS2 hype, SEGA never had a chance.
Well that's obvious. Who likes Sega games will buy the systems where they can play Sega games.
The point was, would it be enough to "beat Sony"? That's the discussion here.
No, it would have helped Microsoft's XBox but it would not beat Sony because of the legions of Final Fantasy fans, who tend to be Square fans and also probably Enix Dragon Quest fans.
However at one point during Virtua Fighter 2's huge arcade popularity during 94, 95 and 96 Japan, millions of Saturns and VF 2 copies were sold in that country prompting an Anime series, the not as well liked VF3 sequel and many years later to try to recapture that old magic, SEGA made VF4 to bring back VF2 fans.
SEGA has made alot of very great RPGs but due to their low console sales in Japan, someone familiar with Final Fantasy 5 may not be as familiar with Phantasy Star 4 during the SNES/Gen days, Panzer Dragoon Saga was almost completely ignored due to gamer apathy and Skies of Arcadia was swallowed up in the hype for Final Fantasy 9 in both Japan and the US and probably Europe too.
As a matter of fact when it comes to RPGs in Japan (biggest sellers), most only seem to remember Square Final Fantasy and Enix Dragon Quest in the top 2 slots followed by the same two later merged company list since NES or Famicom was very popular in Japan that those games established themselves as dynasties that except for Enix has been able to establish a base in the US and Europe and other territories.
And I say that with my opinion being that other devs (neither being SquarEnix) have made some really good, great and better than FF RPGs but they never got recognized due to fan person/group apathy of always, probably saying "oh this game is good by its a wannabe or not as good as FF"
Very few outside of Japan enjoyed Virtua Fighter, Virtual On, Fighting Vipers, Shenmue, Skies of Arcadia, Panzer series, Shining series, Nights into Dreams, Burning Rangers, Jet Set Radio, Virtua Cop, Shinobi, The House of the Dead series, etc as people have enjoyed PS2 games but even then, IMO most PS2 games don't really reach mass appeal unless they fall into a couple of the current trend categories:
Final Fantasy like or SquarEnix game
Metal Gear Solid like or maybe Silent Hill like
GTA like
or the Blasto/Jak/Rachet&Clank/Crash Bandicoot/Spiro Dragon field.
Basically with so many PS2 games in the so many installed user base field of PS2, alot of good games will still get swallowed up in the path of the established watermark games decreed by some magazine that decides what get to grace a cover.