D
Deleted member 7537
Guest
Until i see SP on PS4 i want draw conclusions, but it seems that BF4 on PS4 will look significantly better.
Digital Foundry Article Technical Discussion Archive [2013]
- Thread starter helio
- Start date
-
- Tags
- digital foundry
- Status
D
Deleted member 7537
Guest
Comparison GIF
http://i.minus.com/ib0gOrDzD8ScKG.gif
The difference is there.
Edit: WTF happended to DF captures, they look way different from what i've seen in other sites.
http://i.minus.com/ib0gOrDzD8ScKG.gif
The difference is there.
Edit: WTF happended to DF captures, they look way different from what i've seen in other sites.
Battlefield 4: Which is better - Xbox One or PS4?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=705961
http://www.videogamer.com/features/article/battlefield_4_which_is_better_xbox_one_or_ps4.html
Battlefield 4: Xbox One vs. PlayStation 4 Frame-Rate Tests
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWzkw32amOM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=705961
http://www.videogamer.com/features/article/battlefield_4_which_is_better_xbox_one_or_ps4.html
Battlefield 4: Xbox One vs. PlayStation 4 Frame-Rate Tests
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWzkw32amOM
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, there's no getting around thin geometry & resolution.
Shot #006 is pretty stark too. The post-AA and DOF looks really borked on XO.
Last edited by a moderator:
The assets look identical, what are you looking for?
You can really see the halo effect from the sharpening in that one. The Xbox One comes across like a TV that is in showroom mode.
DF thinks software by the game. Probably to composite a native resolution HUD over the 900p game. Considering we don't know of any other PS4 games that are sub-1080p I wouldn't be worried too much about scaling problems.
Non-DF Non-cutscene comparison (gameplay).
Why is the scaling so terrible? Even all EA's PS3 games were weren't as fuzzy as this when upscaled.
Someone from DF admitted their captures were flawed.
DICE supplied capture hardware to use but DF uses their own with fudged settings.
ModEdit: Source
As far as I can tell from Elgato's website, they capture at 30fps only for 1080p feeds, so that's probably the reason why DF used their own devices.
That's exactly what I'm thinking. Are some of these boxes outputting reduced/full range and not being captured accordingly?
As for the differences, although the XB1 version is the lesser, it still looks remarkably similar. Joe Gamer won't notice the difference. The only huge difference that'd bug me is the lack of AO. Where on the PS4 version the guy on the floor was casting a contact shadow, there was no such shadow in the XB1 version and that really breaks the composition. If it were me, I'd add in the shadows at a sacrifice elsewhere.
djskribbles
Legend
I think the aliasing is pretty distracting. The sharpening amplifies it. That's the biggest difference to me.
Billy Idol
Legend
Versions look astoundingly close...I did think there should have been a bigger impact on IQ due to the higher resolution...but I guess I am wrong.
Only thing that's a bit different: AO.
And if I read it right, PS4 packing in HBAO is quite a surprise, as this is typically the first thing I turn down to enhance my fps
Only thing that's a bit different: AO.
And if I read it right, PS4 packing in HBAO is quite a surprise, as this is typically the first thing I turn down to enhance my fps
Why? 900p is about 50% more pixels to draw than XB1's 720p, so that in itself covers the simple metric comparison. Adding in the other differences, there's quite a lot less numerically on the XB1. Of course, it's not as obvious to viewers which is what some have been saying for quite a while now. The actual image as seen by gamers isn't '50% better' given what the average Joe would take 50% to be, which would be 50% more everything and actually require an order of magnitude more power to enable. Is that what you mean?
HBAO is quite the doozy though. XB1 is the worse off for its absence.
- Status
Similar threads
