Both versions are sub-HD.
i know but the PS3 version is missing more polys:smile:
B3D News Item: Challenge: Find Differences between Crysis 2 Console SKUs
- Thread starter KKRT
- Start date
i know but the PS3 version is missing more polys:smile:
About self shadows seem you are right, but on 360 if you don't install the game, pop in on the texture it's more evident and AF seem weak sometimes. It's just the pro & vs of both versions. The temporal AA (or custom AA of Crytek) it's almost useless in motion on both, a 'massive' fest of aliasing; sure not good how MLAA how Crytek quote sometimes ago. It's must be interesting if we have tried to combine MLAA+custom AA, but obviously the cost not allow that. I just hope the future update with adding culling on the spu can give free way for a further MLAA combination, but maybe my expectations are too high.
Last edited by a moderator:
Silent_Buddha
Legend
It's more complicated than just that. Assuming this is still P2P connections, the host has to do much of the work a server would normally do in a client-server setup. The available CPU and memory available on a system in that case is going to be a far more limiting factor than bandwidth for # of supported players. CPU and memory which must be dedicated to hosting the game session and thus cannot be used for rendering graphics. And in multiplayer the CPU time and memory amount used per additional player is generally quite a bit more than it is per additional AI NPC.
Regards,
SB
I don't take too seriously the ign statement
what the hell of features has less ps3? Jeez I hate when someone tries to pass how technical how seem more personal perspective... Did they have at least a serious analysis from that & to count the fps for confirm that? Just to know. From now I noticed only a worsen shadows pop in on the ps3...
Last edited by a moderator:
BS I'll tell you that.Crysis 2 in motion is clean and smooth looking game.Its not GOW III but I would put it beyond Reach in terms of crispness from what I'm seeing and thats certainly not "jaggie fest".
djskribbles
Legend
I don't know who this Arthur Gies is, but people on GAF label him a 360 fanboy.I don't take too seriously the ign statement
Judging by the screens, I have to agree that he has some bias. I mean, they look virtually identical and he rates the PS3 version 1 point lower? wtf?
They tries to said on the ps3 has major issue? It seem pretty strange, considering the resolution...
dragonelite
Veteran
He also mentioned framerate being less stable then on 360.
But i have seen too much name calling in that gaf thread.
Some are even saying Cod4 looks way better.
Personally from what i played at a friend the game actually quit smooth have to wait till Thursday when i get my 360 version.
eh... people can have different opinions on what they find acceptable. The thread's about Crysis 2 console differences, so let's not derail the discussion.
-----------
Also on another note, discussing review scores and user bias should be pretty far removed from the forums here... we've had plenty of derailed threads in the past from such things.
hey, your choice but I suggest you see it running LIVE on a machine with a reasonably calibrated display before passing final judgement (since it is now released)
it is stunning in real life.
I don't need to when the screenshot clearly shows major problems to not make it the best.Practically every edge has jaggies along with the low res look.
Last edited by a moderator:
Now you know why every company this gen uses bullshots, because the deception works.
oh. Alrighty then.
Subtlesnake
Regular
Wow, so everything that could occur on screen when playing is contained within that single screenshot? Pretty impressive.
haha, my bad was in a hurry when posting.
