leoneazzurro
Regular
Adored TV already stated that 1000W is extremely exaggerated
I agree, so I won't go into anything specific.bit disrespectful as well. It's only one more day....
Well, the guide admits several losses to the 1080FE, though some games are benched at less than max settings to minimze the loss. While the wins are slightly larger with the use of some DX12 titles.I take it they are in line with what we are expecting? 1070 ~ RX56 : 1080 ~ RX64 : 1080+ ~ RX Water?
It's exaggerated if you exclude CPU overclocking. But if you overclock some of the recent CPUs (Skylake X, Threadripper), then it's not exaggerated.I don't think AMD would exaggerate something like this without good reason.
Threadripper. System consumption without the GPU could be upwards of 500W overclocked and not account for crap PSUs. Unless the reviews show Vega at a whopping 700W it won't be a problem.I don't think AMD would exaggerate something like this without good reason.
I don't think AMD would exaggerate something like this without good reason.
There is a good reason. They have to account for very shitty chinese PSUs.I don't think AMD would exaggerate something like this without good reason.
These charts are based on 3DMark numbers, not actual games.here are the first leaked test results
+31% to Fury X if those numbers (102,94/78,63) are taken as the real deal?Anyhow, here are the first leaked test results.
http ://i.imgur.com/hzlpNJN.jpg
Nobody is going to be paying for it?Vega56 looks to be a winrar ...
Apparently the 56 is August 28th.is the 56 coming out in sept ?
of course its the day i'm flying to Disney land for the half !Apparently the 56 is August 28th.
It's never faster than a 1080Ti, the only time it gets close is in BF1 DX12, and that's because all NV GPUs have bad performance in that mode to begin with, AMD cards have inconsistent performance as well in this title, so virtually no one plays the game @DX12.wow a real mixed bag sometimes its barely faster than a fury x and soetimes its faster than a 1080 ti fe