D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
I liked one of the comments: Ryzen CPUs are becoming hardware lootboxes
Bondrewd
Veteran
Aren't 2666 SODIMMs non-JEDEC?
mfaisalkemal
Newcomer
AMD confirms that the HP Envy x360 uses Mobile XFR(25W)
https://techreport.com/news/32912/amd-confirms-that-the-hp-envy-x360-uses-mobile-xfr
with graphics performance better than iris 580(6770hq TDP 45W) at only 55.55% tdp and maybe better price than intel iris 640 or iris 650, i hope amd win many design for notebook and macbook pro 13.
https://techreport.com/news/32912/amd-confirms-that-the-hp-envy-x360-uses-mobile-xfr
with graphics performance better than iris 580(6770hq TDP 45W) at only 55.55% tdp and maybe better price than intel iris 640 or iris 650, i hope amd win many design for notebook and macbook pro 13.
el etro
Newcomer
NBC review bashed Mobile Ryzen heavily. Look at the Laptopmag review(R5U versus I5U): https://www.laptopmag.com/articles/amd-ryzen-mobile-vs-intel-8th-gen-core
Both extremes are equally little enlightening with regards to platform potential.
AMD obviously (deftly or underhandedly, take your pick) deemphasized the Acer Swift 3 as it seems to be a best case scenario for the 8th. gen Intel platform (hell, it's faster than most, if not all, 8th. gen i7s I've seen benchmarked) in their press material. Silly.
On the other hand, it's equally silly to make a case for further penalizing the "25W" Ryzen 5 against the "15W" i5 based on the HP vs the Acer system when you are purporting to make inferences about the underlying platform.
There is just way too much (potential) variability from one OEM configuration to the next to know decidedly without a much larger sampling of systems.
AMD obviously (deftly or underhandedly, take your pick) deemphasized the Acer Swift 3 as it seems to be a best case scenario for the 8th. gen Intel platform (hell, it's faster than most, if not all, 8th. gen i7s I've seen benchmarked) in their press material. Silly.
On the other hand, it's equally silly to make a case for further penalizing the "25W" Ryzen 5 against the "15W" i5 based on the HP vs the Acer system when you are purporting to make inferences about the underlying platform.
There is just way too much (potential) variability from one OEM configuration to the next to know decidedly without a much larger sampling of systems.
Relax.
Fake.
Fake.
Last edited:
Bondrewd
Veteran
Oh, they are not slowing down.
It's most likely fake:
- Horrible compression
- Ryzen Pro event
- Ryzen Mobile APU says "launches" while anything before it says "launched" > picture taken before Ryzen APUs launched
I'd say the 2nd gen Ryzen & Ryzen Gaming Mobile APU thingy were added by whoever chopped the picture up
- Horrible compression
- Ryzen Pro event
- Ryzen Mobile APU says "launches" while anything before it says "launched" > picture taken before Ryzen APUs launched
I'd say the 2nd gen Ryzen & Ryzen Gaming Mobile APU thingy were added by whoever chopped the picture up
ok, but what about this one: http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_r...e1d0e0d9ebdae2c4b68bbb9df89da090b6c5f8c0&l=en
Acer Swift 3 with Ryzen mobile:
Acer Swift 3 with Ryzen mobile:
Last edited:
https://videocardz.com/74464/amd-preparing-mobile-ryzen-5-apu-with-vega-11-graphics
65 W for a mobile APU?
65 W for a mobile APU?
Bondrewd
Veteran
Probably positioned against I3-8100 and similar. More meant for SFF PCs/NUCs than laptops.
Odd they don't have any SKUs between 15W and 65W TDP. Maybe they can up/down configure TDP in software.
Cheers
Bondrewd
Veteran
Read the slides, carefully.
I read "AMD Ryzen Mobile Processor" https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2017/12/AMD-Ryzen-APU-G-Series-2400G-2200G-1000x563.jpg
(AM4 is not a mobile socket, it's FM5)
(AM4 is not a mobile socket, it's FM5)
I won CPU lottery! Shame this is for my customer, but still!!
AMD Ryzen R5 1600
Tested it on various 3D rendering programs and in 3D Mark and so far so good!
It also clocks to 3.8GHz all 8 cores with 1.3V stable on this boxed cooler. This is practically in line with my R7 1700
No BIOS mods or anything like that, I build this PC and started testing it after installing Windows 10. My first test was Cinebench 15 and it gave 1494, I thought this is a bit high for vanilla R5 1600, so I've opened task manager and counted processor threads 3 times just to be sure!
Unicorn found!
AMD Ryzen R5 1600
Tested it on various 3D rendering programs and in 3D Mark and so far so good!
It also clocks to 3.8GHz all 8 cores with 1.3V stable on this boxed cooler. This is practically in line with my R7 1700
No BIOS mods or anything like that, I build this PC and started testing it after installing Windows 10. My first test was Cinebench 15 and it gave 1494, I thought this is a bit high for vanilla R5 1600, so I've opened task manager and counted processor threads 3 times just to be sure!
Unicorn found!
Similar threads
