What's the point... 12nm cheaper now that 14/16nm ?
Will be interesting to see if the 1060 w/ GDDR5X remains competitive.A 10~15% boost for little work must have made sense. It certainly makes the 1060 look like a questionable buy now.
New product names, and better perf while competing against 1060. From a marketing/sales pov it makes sense, from an informed consumer pov not so much.
To compete with Polaris 30, nvidia is reportedly going to launch a GTX 2060 and GTX 2050 Ti at CES.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-RTX-2000-series-Mobility-GPU-lineup-leaked.337912.0.html
https://wccftech.com/exclusive-nvidia-rtx-mobility-graphics-cards-lineup-leaked/
I think the argument would be that prolonging the very old GFX8 ISA isn't great, so they're not giving devs a larger userbase of GPUs with newer stuff like RPM, ROV and Conservative Rasterization which should increase performance in games.From any point of view, something that performs at 1.1x is better than something that performs at 1.0x.
Are we expecting RTX functionality in the 2060? If those features are already being put to question in the RTX 2070, then in a smaller GPU they'd make even less sense.If non-Turing, that's a horrible name.
Are we expecting RTX functionality in the 2060? If those features are already being put to question in the RTX 2070, then in a smaller GPU they'd make even less sense.
The lower-end 2000 series are probably just bringing Volta SMs and 12nm (or maybe 7nm?) to the public.
To compete with Polaris 30, nvidia is reportedly going to launch a GTX 2060 and GTX 2050 Ti at CES.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-RTX-2000-series-Mobility-GPU-lineup-leaked.337912.0.html
https://wccftech.com/exclusive-nvidia-rtx-mobility-graphics-cards-lineup-leaked/
A Volta port is almost a turing with respects to rasterization . Kudos to them if they are able to bring these new ported SKUs in the next months.
I do think, because wccftech doesn't really know what RTX means and why a 2060/2050 most probably doesn't belong in the RTX family.The RTX Lineup launches at CES, don't think this also accounts for the smaller 2060 and 2050Ti.
I do think, because wccftech doesn't really know what RTX means and why a 2060/2050 most probably doesn't belong in the RTX family.
They had been calling it RTX 2060/2050 in the very same article they redacted. For them, the 2000 series are all RTX.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/german-editor-confirms-radeon-rx-590-as-12nm-polaris-30.htmlBy posting the two photos it is now confirmed that the Radeon RX 590 is a real thing, and you can read that it is a FinFET 12 aka 12nm fabricated product. The earlier leaked result has demonstrated the product (RX 590) to be clocked at ~1545 MHz clock. The suggested retail price would hover in the $299,- which is a good chunk more expensive than a RX 580 8GB at $229.
The respin GPU would be the 3rd iteration of Polaris, now noted as Polaris 30.
At least the XFX Fatboys perf/watt is similar to RX 580https://videocardz.com/79077/amd-radeon-rx-590-review-roundup
performance wise pathetic, memory bandwidth restrained, performance/price not great, power consumption very high.