That TV is not techically a 4k TV, the term 4k is derived from the 4096 resolution.
That TV is 3840 so it's not 4k
That TV is not techically a 4k TV, the term 4k is derived from the 4096 resolution.
That TV is 3840 so it's not 4k
The HDMI 1.4 specification adds support for extremely high video resolutions that go far beyond today’s 1080p systems. 4K is shorthand for 4,000 lines wide by 2,000 lines high, or roughly four times the resolution of a 1080p display. The term actually covers two formats, both supported in the HDMI 1.4 specification:
3840 pixels wide by 2160 pixels high
4096 pixels wide by 2160 pixels high
It's close enough and it's in 16:9 format. Consumer products will use that resolution and it actually is classified as 4K also.
http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_1_4/4K.aspx
That's like saying 1680x1050 is Full HD....
FYI, my old 32" flat-screen CRT television has 60+kg of glass in the tube!Because the tubes were massive and expensive.
Most 4k sets have less than 4000 columns. 3840 x 2160 is a close resolution at a simple doubling of each dimension of 1080p, which is good for upscaling and I guess good for manufacture. The official standard UHD is this 3840x2160. 4k column displays/projectors aren't 16:9 either. Thus 4k has been adopted as the simple term for describing the increased res, instead of QTHD (quad-true HD) or 3.8k. It's not really different to CRTs having less visible screen than the given diagonal dimension, or car manufacturers rounding their engine capacity (rather optimistically). Of course, if they'd stuck with 2160p we could be exact and consistent.That TV is not techically a 4k TV, the term 4k is derived from the 4096 resolution.
That TV is 3840 so it's not 4k
Most 4k sets have less than 4000 columns. 3840 x 2160 is a close resolution at a simple doubling of each dimension of 1080p, which is good for upscaling and I guess good for manufacture. The official standard UHD is this 3840x2160. 4k column displays/projectors aren't 16:9 either. Thus 4k has been adopted as the simple term for describing the increased res, instead of QTHD (quad-true HD) or 3.8k. It's not really different to CRTs having less visible screen than the given diagonal dimension, or car manufacturers rounding their engine capacity (rather optimistically). Of course, if they'd stuck with 2160p we could be exact and consistent.
There you go, then. A marketing term has been coined. 4k remains a casual reference though, and will remain in technical conversation, I'm sure, as it's used in cinema
Have moved it to 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices. Is that better?It has no bearing on (console) gaming, so no, we're not overly interested.
Have moved it to 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices. Is that better?