(my post from AVS on what LGD needs to do)
When LGD was the only game in town, we got comfortable with just measuring the different implementations of the same panel and our core comparison was mainly peak brightness. That's no longer the case with a QDO in the picture.
The three areas where LGD needs to step up:
- APL across the range
- High color volume
- Consistency in brightness across scenarios
HDTVPolska, I believe most here will find Vincent levels of credible so I'll use their data points:
First the color volume delta, which some can reasonably argue is limited to certain titles. However that content is going to grow as UHD HDR continues to mature.
That's a real difference and well beyond the 'numbers.' I don't think I need to label which one is on WOLED and which one is QD OLED!
Now lets look at the brightness and importantly, the consistency of the brightness across the image. We know how world class the Pana JZ2000 series is so lets use that as a reference (2022 flagships haven't been tested by HDTVPolska yet).
Panasonic JZ2000:
Samsung S95B:
There's a major difference in the consistency of the HDR experience in actual content, well beyond just looking at some brightness figures in the traditional windowed measurement. The quality of the experience is less content dependent as the QDO panel will deliver to across the board.
My point is we're well beyond just seeing who can win the 10% window tests going forward. There's other factors as play here where LGD and it's customers need to step up across the board. This is on top of the superior uniformity, no tint, no dse etc.