There's probably a reason they're not touting it.. from the supposed comparison, there's little difference.
I think that’s what it’s rated to go up to. Measuring is the only sure way to tell.
Probably 2.18ghz for general compute functions and up to 2.35ghz for specific modes, BC and possibly ML upscaling (to reach about 300 TOPs). There could be others modes in between.
Exactly like I expected.
To be confirmed but the APU seems smaller than 7nm PS5 and still using liquid metal, as expected. Likely using 4nm, max 5nm. The high power consumption should mean the RDNA4 tech packed inside (and all the previous GPU customizations from PS4 Pro and PS5!) is consuming decent amount of power
The PS5 pro has 1.2gb more ram dedicated to games. So 800mb of additional ram for the OS.
It should be PSU spec. Actual power may be half of the PSU spec. Pro is around 190~200W.
Why is there assumption Pro uses 6nm?
Rich from DF said he thought it would be 6nm, but his reasoning never made any sense to me.
Wasn't this game CPU limited? Also that isn't a stable 60. More like 50-60 fps. And that's really troubling, as that would mean that the base PS5 is actually GPU limited most of the time in performance mode. How is that possible, it looks like 540p??
