D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Atari and Amiga. No love for Charles Babbage's difference engine?How do you think Atari and Amiga fans feel? It's been far longer for them.
Atari and Amiga. No love for Charles Babbage's difference engine?How do you think Atari and Amiga fans feel? It's been far longer for them.
I just had a funny case on my website
I posted the news that 9 Xbox One First Party Exclusives were going to PC in 2016, making a final comment that I was not shure this was good on the console perspective and asking the readers their oppinion. And was attacked by three readers that claimed I was a fanboy, that I was leading people, etc, etc.
I stated it was only an oppinion, not a fact, and that the idea was to open a debate on the comments section.
They continued to attack... and I went to check them.
At first I noticed two of them were using the same e-mail... So I asked for clarification!
I received two very similar answers claiming they were two different persons, and even giving me their full name. But... funny enough, one of them changed the e-mail... to the e-mail of the third one.
So I re-checked them all... and they all were using the same IP.
It was only one person... Commenting as three to make their arguments beliavable...
This is incredible... Its sick... and requires treatment.
This is incredible... Its sick... and requires treatment.
Even if you can make a case for "consoles being more powerful than PC's in the past and needing dual GPU monster PC's to over power them" Since the XBox/PS2 generation, that would only have been true for at best 6 months into the consoles launch.
However... the Geforce 3 Ti 500 had a slightly faster core clock than the NV2a and 25% faster memory clock. So while NV2A had higher vertex shading capability the Ti500 was faster in most other respects. The NV2a did, as you say have some architectural improvements but as I recall they were pretty minor and not on the same level as the improvements introduced in the GeForce 4 Ti 6 months later. Combined with a decent amount of RAM and a CPU that easily overpowered that available in the original Xbox I think it's fair to say that in November 2001 you could build a PC that was pretty even with the Xbox in performance terms without requiring a dual GPU rig. It would have cost a fortune to be sure, but a single GPU box could just about keep up.
Actually when it launched the 360 delivered results significantly below those that the 7900 (when it later launched) would deliver, or indeed the flagship GPU of the time, the 7800 GTX512 - terms of resolution/frame rate. It was much later (years) when the PC market had almost entirely transitioned to the unified shaders that Xenos was based on that we started to see the 7xxx series really suffer in console games. And I'd argue that's as much down to NV abandoning driver support for the architecture along with developers optimising for unified shader architectures at the expense of separate pixel/vertex shaders as it was down to Xenos being better utilised. As I recall correctly, ATI's X18/19xx series continued to perform well throughout the whole generation though.
So at the Xbox 360 launch you could build a single GPU system which would have been either competitive with, or outright outperforming the XB360 for at least a couple of years ...
...while if you waited 2 months for the X1900XTX launch you could have had a GPU that was unequivocally more powerful that Xenos.
Clearly consoles were still in a very good position back then performance wise, but I think it shows that there's been a general trend away from high powered consoles for a long time. PS1 > PS2 > PS3 > PS4 when it comes to comparisons to PC's on their launch dates. And PS1 was really the last time that a console was clearly more powerful than the best single GPU PC's at the point it launched, and for some time after.
Atari and Amiga. No love for Charles Babbage's difference engine?
But unequivocally less advanced, and that aged worse (though much better than the shitty 7900) and that drew something like 3 ~ 5 times the power.
Allow me to disagree. The R580 aged brilliantly throughout the later and most advanced DX9 titles like UT3, Mass Effect, Bioshock, Supreme Commander, etc.
Up to 2009, it could play every multiplatform game at 1080p with the same IQ settings as the X360.
TDP was 125W (less than first-gen X360?), but performance was almost 3x better too.
That's bizarre. Almost a religious devotion to a console.
What's your website?
Portuguese One... PCMANIAS.COM
I recently ran GTA5 on 3870 DDR3.Allow me to disagree. The R580 aged brilliantly throughout the later and most advanced DX9 titles like UT3, Mass Effect, Bioshock, Supreme Commander, etc.
Up to 2009, it could play every multiplatform game at 1080p with the same IQ settings as the X360.
TDP was 125W (less than first-gen X360?), but performance was almost 3x better too.
the 7900 GTX aged like a turd.
But unequivocally less advanced, and that aged worse (though much better than the shitty 7900) and that drew something like 3 ~ 5 times the power.
Nooo! Why does everyone forget the Dreamcast? Everyone forgets about the Dreamcst...
I recently ran GTA5 on 3870 DDR3.
It worked, less than 30fps at 800x600 though.
I just saw the comments to the article in question (BTW first sentence: "A Microsoft desde há varios anos", com "h") and to be fair, the guy seems to be from Brazil where retail availability of gaming consoles and high-performance PC hardware is almost non-existent so they end up being pretty expensive to those who want it.
where do you write articles?Unfortunately part of them were lost. The conversation was happening at a time my host changed my webpage to a better server... And the last entries on the database were lost!
And yes.. He was from Brazil... And I agree with your arguments about their reality.
And it´s hard to deal with this stuff... Everytime I post something that states the obvious reality between consoles... I get attacked!
In 2013 I wrote several articles about the expected performance of both consoles and how PS4 hardware was more powerful... And I was attacked and called fanboy.
I proved all MisterXmedia theories wrong with several articles I also wrote.. And was called fanboy!
I wrote about the Xbox doesn't´t having any special hardware for the use of the cloud, and how any system can use it... I was a fanboy.
I spoke about the eSRAM and how it´s existence would be bad for Xbox on first generation games, although usage and performance would improve with time... I was a fanboy
I wrote about DX 12 not being a secret sauce but only an improvement on the existing Xbox One API. I was a fanboy.
I talked about assync compute, how it works and how the PS4 could increase the gap over the Xbox One with it´s use... I was a fanboy...
Pfff...
All those fanboys seem to like to read are the articles I write that are favorable to the Xbox (for example, like having a better CPU, or better overall bandwidth, etc). But in that case... I have the PS4 fanboys kicking my ass
PS: You understand Portuguese?
Dude he believes it so much that he makes me wonder.....is he that blind.....or could it be for real?You know insanity is contagious, right?
Well just let it all out. This is the thread for that!Pfff...
Dude, we're friggin' colleagues (Eletrotécnica FEUP '02)PS: You understand Portuguese?