Great my 2 year old CRT HDTV from Samsung is 1080i only
You've got one that's from 2004 that doesn't do 720p? What's the model?
Great my 2 year old CRT HDTV from Samsung is 1080i only
Only the HD standard requires 16:9 WIDESCREEN, 1024x768 is 4:3.
Great my 2 year old CRT HDTV from Samsung is 1080i only
Ok, so maybe this problem is mostly a big deal for those who didn't buy their HDTVs in the last 6 months. There's quite a few people in that situation though and I'm betting most of them don't particularly want to replace their HDTVs yet. I'm holding off on upgrading mine to see which of the various new display technologies that have been talked about for the last few years actually pans out to be the best, and also for the prices to drop further.
You've got one that's from 2004 that doesn't do 720p? What's the model?
Ding Ding Ding!! HD-Ready plasmas like the Panasonic ones have non-square pixels.
Really, you won't win this argument with me because i have been through it many times on the AVForums.
I completely understand that people are using old sets and dont want to upgrade them, why fix it if its not broke? But bashing Sony because there old set only does 1080i is quite frankly, silly.
The HD standard is aload of rubbish, ive seen TV's for sale in currys that have HD-READY stamped all over the display and its box, then it says the displays native resolution is 640x480 ( not even widescreen either ) Companys know that if they stamp "HD-READY" all over there not so HD-READY display they'll sell more.
.
Ive been in the HIGH-END Home Cinema industry for over 8yrs, dont argue with me TBH
I find that hard to believe, but if you really have seen TVs with the HD-Ready logo, and after inspection you have seen that they have 640*480 resolution, legally you could even sue Currys or whatever the manufacturer is for false advertising.
The HD-Ready standard is not rubbish, or are you saying that "it's rubbish anyway" only because i just proved you wrong?
Really immature vibes i get from you.
Doesn't change the fact that you (like many other confused consumers) do not know that the plasma TVs sold by the likes of Panasonic ARE fully HD-Ready, with a resolution of 1024*768 non-square pixels.
Whether you have been to the Ultra High End Premium Car Boot Sale Special Bingo or not, it's very simple. And underlining, bolding and putting stars around it won't make it any more special.
Link
TV above, advertised as HD-READY, has according to specs, a resolution lower then 1280x720. Best start your law suit against Currys
One of the funnyest and most often asked question i get asked by a customer is " Why are you DVD players over £900, when currys have them for as little as £30 "
Its make me chuckle inside everytime i get asked that.
How many total pixels is 720p, and how many is a "non-square pixel" 1024x768 display?
Please do tell me where you see HD-Ready in that page.
There is "High definition" (legally doesn't mean anything in europe). You might even find "HD-Compatible" (Which means that the set can accept HD resolutions but won't be able to display them). But not HD-Ready.
Case closed.
The point here is not about how many pixels you need, or whether you firmly believe that 1024*768 is not HD.
Real HD : 1280x720 = 921, 600 pixels
Your HD : 1024x768 = 786, 432 pixels
Play some native 720p video on either display, i know witch one will look sharper and show more detail.
Look you're not getting the point across so i'll leave it here.
Put it this way then, we put 2 TV's side by side and TV number 1 has a native panel resolution of 1280x720 and a pixel aspect ratio of 16:9. TV number 2 has a native panel resolution of 1024x768 with a pixel aspect ratio of 4:3.
Now we play a native 720p film on both sets, the film has been recorded at a resolution of 1280x720 and has a pixel aspect ratio of 16:9, what set is the film gonna look better on?