PlayStation 3 GPU: NV40 and NV50 Hybrid with XDR DRAM...

Why are you people even reading that Inquirer trash? Don't you know by now all they publish is lies and BS?

If you remember all the trash speculation Fuad wrote about Radeon X800 (think "extreme pipelines" here :LOL:), surely you must realize there's no way they could have the slightest clue what PS3 GPU's supposed to look like.

It's clear the Inquirer has failed!
 
Jaws said:
Pheewww...typing it out is way longer than it took the suggestion to register! :)

Then you read far too much into what I was saying since I was responding to the specific quoted elements.

Guden Oden said:
Why are you people even reading that Inquirer trash? Don't you know by now all they publish is lies and BS?

If you remember all the trash speculation Fuad wrote about Radeon X800 (think "extreme pipelines" here :LOL:), surely you must realize there's no way they could have the slightest clue what PS3 GPU's supposed to look like.

I wouldn't dismiss The Inquirer out of hand - especially when Mike get his hands on some of the CPU information. Even though Fudu does have appear to pepper contradicting stories about sometimes these are the things that he's being fed from various industry sources and hes reporting them - Fudo's main problem is that he's not threading them together and trying to sort out the misdirection from the useful threads, but being paid per article (I assume) its not really worth his time doing that. The "Extreme Pipelines" was something that ATI had purposefully fed to their AIB's knowing that they would leak it - if you look I had dropped a few hints about that late 2003 because I had heard it as well (although given the vaugeness that it had when it was said to me I suspected that it wasn't really telling the truth), but by Jan '04 I knew the real deal.

In otherwords, read the Inq stories take them in, but try and sort through them yourself. And if I link to one you know that my thinking is going along the same lines...
 
Back
Top