Um I see nothing for X360 fans to be worried about. The PS3 doesn't even have any Edram to help with bandwidth. The systems are a wash in realworld performance. The X360 if anything is more efficient in 3 ways:Tacitblue said:Well, the gauntlet has been thrown down.......XBox360 becomes XBox180......half the power....and running 180 degrees from the competition. At least fairweather MS fanboys are. Been browsing some of the XBox forums and some of them are in a suspension of disbelief, frankly can't say i blame 'em. We'll see if the paper differences pan out at all.
there isn't much going on at the moment for the other sides except gates saying halo 3 will launch to counter the ps3GwymWeepa said:Okay, so this thread has a lot more attention than the other two, Sony has this knack of attracting attention to itself.
PARANOiA said:Tacitblue said:Well, the gauntlet has been thrown down.......XBox360 becomes XBox180......half the power....and running 180 degrees from the competition. At least fairweather MS fanboys are. Been browsing some of the XBox forums and some of them are in a suspension of disbelief, frankly can't say i blame 'em. We'll see if the paper differences pan out at all.
You're either joking or an idiot.
nAo said:Gigapixel is dead and buried and RSX is buried too
LOL..maybe I'm being oversensitive here but 22 GB/s devoted to textures, back buffer and front buffer, with 720p rendering, fp buffers and AA seem QUITE low to me.
Maybe they left out AA support on fp buffers...
jvd said:there isn't much going on at the moment for the other sides except gates saying halo 3 will launch to counter the ps3
V3 said:Someone got mirror to the controller pic ?
V3 said:Someone got mirror to the controller pic ?