The "Sony has games" argument always boils down to MGS4 and FF13, with a second tier of KZ2, Home and LBP.
Gran Turismo 5 firmly belongs in the first tier.
The "Sony has games" argument always boils down to MGS4 and FF13, with a second tier of KZ2, Home and LBP.
In the last few months its gaming library expanded rapidly with some great exclusive titles that make the platform stand out again for its broad range of titles.
Home is nearing completion, and if it works, it could mean a big change in this area.
BluRay for games is starting to pay off visibly in its exclusive titles.
Also, early adapters are more into checking out new developments, but the next wave of consumers tend to be a little bit more conservative and brand-minded.
...if developers won't change to more Burnout-like development strategies, that may keep them from getting that 'best performing hardware' status.
Finally, they'll have a tough battle in getting the cost down.
Gran Turismo 5 firmly belongs in the first tier.
In the last few months its gaming library expanded rapidly with some great exclusive titles that make the platform stand out again for its broad range of titles.
Is this different for the ps3?The 360 is going to stick around as well. It's close enough to the PS3 (and vice versa) to ensure that multi-platform games will typically be released on both of these systems, and this won't change very soon either, especially not in the US, but it's doing well in the UK also, which is an important European market. Right now, the 360 is benefitting a lot from Live and being closer to PCs in terms of development environment and tools, and this helps the 360 maintain a good reputation in terms of mostly having the better performing multi-platform titles, as did the Xbox.Another genuine risk is, I keep saying it because I don't think it has changed yet , the DVD drive, and Sony's Home project.As PCs move on, the question will be how long before the 360 games become very weak versions of their PC counterparts, as happened last year.
I'm sorry but the market clearly doesn't give a damn about these exclusive titles. It's like Lair, Heavenly Sword, Ratchet and maybe even Uncharted has never existed... I know it's disappointing, it is to me too, but the fact is that the market thinks there aren't any big exclusives for the PS3 at all.
Arwin, you're ignoring my point completely. Yes there are exclusive titles available, but noone's buying them at all.
Arwin, you're ignoring my point completely. Yes there are exclusive titles available, but noone's buying them at all.
Final Fantasy games are far from innovative - and this comes from someone who loves them. The only innovative thing I've seen in the long MGS4 trailer was the innovative application to farting and bare buttocks in what I thought was a rather serious game with ambitions for political commentary mumbo-jumbo. Sure, the graphics was amazing when the trailer came out, they had mastered the gritty/realistic lighting like no one at the time, but everyone else has caught up with them.
I just cannot fathom how someone can pay $600 for a PS3 and not pickup either R&C, HS, or Uncharted.
DualD said:I wouldn't call those games strong exclusives
Fact is, they are not strong, ie fresh enough, to sell well. As someone pointed out earlier, Ms has some great exclusive titles i forgot about...at the same time the titles seem to have the appeal of ME which didn't go so well.
We don't know much about Fable 2 yet I think and on a general not why fix something tht don't need fixing with the risk of breaking it...
As someone pointed out earlier, Ms has some great exclusive titles i forgot about...at the same time the titles seem to have the appeal of ME which didn't go so well.
Then why is it after 12 months Sony lacks strong exclusives? As scoob said, their titles aren't resonating with consumers in NA.
And I agree with Laa-Yosh: exclusives don't matter if they don't sell. They aren't a sales point if people don't want them.
ME is actually a counter example to your point as it did nearly 500K in the US and 1M WW. And it was caught in a tight spot with the BioWare/EA/MS tensions and a number of criticisms. And then there is Assassin's Creed that sold amazingly well and is a new IP. Rockband, considering its price at $160 with no non-bundles, did well (almost 400K on 360/PS3).
Some titles are selling very well on the PS3: Madden, NCAA Football, CoD, Assassin's Creed, etc... But they obviously have issues with their exclusives, and one big part is they don't appear to be giving consumers what they want. When a middling title like skate (September, 360) sells better in its first month than R&C, Lair, HS, and Uncharted (2 of those very good and 1 good) then you know that there are problems on many levels.
ME is a other new IP who reach the "One millions" sell in less one month…
So I thinking Sony would like to have only one of these "not so appeal exclusive"…
Get real, Sony have a problem with their "New exclusives", and the problem is PS3 owners don't buy, they bought games you find on the 360!!
Or Games who have good press on the 360 , and also good "téléphone arabe" (arab phone?).
So we can have some interested data with the sells of UT3 on PS3, a game who got no press test release on the 360 before the PS3 launch, it's the only multi-plateform I know release before on PS3…