Exactly. At launch it'll have little competition, and the game has a good chance of being the best looking PS4 game in the launch line-up. Both Resistance and Motorstorm did very well when the PS3 was released, even though their sequels couldn't always replicate their sales numbers. Being a PS4 launch game could give the Killzone franchise a nice boost.
NGGP: NextGen Garbage Pile (aka: No one reads the topics or stays on topic) *spawn*
- Thread starter Barso
- Start date
- Status
Exactly. At launch it'll have little competition, and the game has a good chance of being the best looking PS4 game in the launch line-up. Both Resistance and Motorstorm did very well when the PS3 was released, even though their sequels couldn't always replicate their sales numbers. Being a PS4 launch game could give the Killzone franchise a nice boost.
SenjutsuSage
Newcomer
Love_In_Rio
Veteran
We already stimated 1,5 billion tranies for 32MB ESRAM.680 is 3,5.
Took a look and found 7770 to be at around 1.5 billion and 7850/7870 to be at around 2.8 billion transistors.
I think we'll see the GPU portion of Durango to be about the same size for the 32MB ESRAM.
In terms of silicon cost we may very well see Durango and Orbis to be literally be the same.
SenjutsuSage
Newcomer
Thanks for the link. 1.5 billion tranies lol. So the legendary sauce emerges at last. 
Transistor count demonstrates he can do math for 32MB of 6T-SRAM, dunno that it proves anything else, like even that it's in Durango.
It wouldn't be 1/2 the die even at gpu densities and SRAM should be much more dense.
<edit> I guess you might have meant 1/3rd of the die which would probably be about right for 1.5billion transistors at radeon7xxx density.
It wouldn't be 1/2 the die even at gpu densities and SRAM should be much more dense.
<edit> I guess you might have meant 1/3rd of the die which would probably be about right for 1.5billion transistors at radeon7xxx density.
I don't understand what you profit by using that much of a silicon budget for embedded ram aside from heat savings. I'm not a console engineer but it seems like MS rather than building a wheel, made a square wheel and built an intricate device to shave the corners so the square wheel was less bumpy. Then designed a special rubber material for their road to compensate for the rough ride. But the end result should be as smooth a ride as Sony's wheel.
I hope I'm wrong. I really want to see two monster consoles with great visuals. I have to believe they know what they're doing.
Love_In_Rio
Veteran
There are people in gaf with the latest MS specs doc.He suppossely has it.
Love_In_Rio
Veteran
Computing at near 100% of efficiency and little tdp from the ESRAM part.On the other hand rendering processing will remain weak.Lets see the lighting solution for UE4, if its full computed based Durango may behave well.
http://ps4daily.com/2013/02/playstation-4-cpu-runs-at-2-ghz-rumor/
highly doubt this..but you never know.
highly doubt this..but you never know.
I wish that is true. I think they should oc the GPU to 1GHZ alongside.
Yeah that site doesn't even know how powerful the PS3 is. I wouldn't put much stock in what they're saying about the PS4!
ps4daily.com said:
what was the peak performance of the RSX?
232 GFLOPs if you count in the same way as the 240 GFLOPs in Xenos.
- Status
Similar threads
