With a possible reality of a Durango thats always online and HDMI out only, I am wondering if MS might be tailoring their hardware.
If MS did a survey of its userbase and found a distinct difference between those that readily support the 360 ecosystem versus those that don't then it might warrant MS to produce hardware that more attractive to one set of users versus another set of users.
Obviously you have gamers like us here that tend to purchase a relatively large amount of titles and there must be a subset of gamers that purchase very little. If you could find a general set of hardware attributes that separate those two would it be attractive to a manufacturer to try to weed out those the light console users by removing certain features.
Does it matter if you lose 40%-50% of console sales but retain 80-90%% of software, entertainment content and accessories sales? For subsidized hardware it doesn't make a lot sense to service those that don't return enough in profits to warrant the sale the lossy hardware they purchased.
If MS did a survey of its userbase and found a distinct difference between those that readily support the 360 ecosystem versus those that don't then it might warrant MS to produce hardware that more attractive to one set of users versus another set of users.
Obviously you have gamers like us here that tend to purchase a relatively large amount of titles and there must be a subset of gamers that purchase very little. If you could find a general set of hardware attributes that separate those two would it be attractive to a manufacturer to try to weed out those the light console users by removing certain features.
Does it matter if you lose 40%-50% of console sales but retain 80-90%% of software, entertainment content and accessories sales? For subsidized hardware it doesn't make a lot sense to service those that don't return enough in profits to warrant the sale the lossy hardware they purchased.