The problem with 'the response' is that it's the same strange vagueness that always crops up in these interviews. You rarely get a clear answer to anything. eg. from the same interview asked about XB1S having a slight performance boost (it has, he could have said 'yes' and explained it's very small):
Look how much total bollocks there is in that answer, where the thought process isn't 'what's the right answer to these questions to tell them what they want to know' but 'how do we communicate our message within this framework of them asking questions?'
So really, don't try to read too much into the phrasing, because the phrasing is speaking PR and not English.
It seemed like he was really scared of a backlash at the time if he comes out and says "yeah it's got more processing power". And then people throw a fit "wtf it's got 1 more FPS, Microsoft are such liars!". That's the way I read it as, he was really trying to downplay and not get people's hopes up. Probably because of the crap (somewhat justly) they took over the cloud and whatnot.
Or I dont know the timing of that article but it aso reads like he didn't feel authorized to give out specifics. Because AFAIK eventually MS came out and gave us the exact nature of the increase, the new GPU clock of 914 mhz.
But Phil has said he's really good at unclear
Last edited: